Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9

2012-02-16 Thread Roy Caligan
Hi Tuomas, Actually, I've read the same README and come up with four different camera configurations. I haven't tested them though, because I'm still missing the pre-distortion piece of the puzzle. By bouncing the image off a curved mirror, the image will be distorted as it appears on the scr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9

2012-02-16 Thread kreuzritter2000
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 00:24 +0100 schrieb BARANGER Emmanuel: > I think you misinterpreted that. I refuse nothing and besides, when I > had access to the fantastic work of the PAF Team, I added it on GIT, > albeit with some corrections and / or amended (with error may be possible ). Oh,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9

2012-02-16 Thread Heiko Schulz
> They seek only to > discredit me in the eyes of all. I think I've proven myself many times > and I have never refused any improvements for my aircraft hangar. > Except, I confess, for JSBSim (and even if the work is good why I > refuse, even JSBSim ). Beside the fact that it isn't quite true

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9

2012-02-15 Thread BARANGER Emmanuel
Le 15/02/2012 19:38, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a écrit : > -- > > Message: 22 > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:30:51 +0100 > From: kreuzritter2000 > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fair practice& autorisations > To:flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne