Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main bootstrap.cxx, 1.40, 1.41 fg_init.cxx, 1.239, 1.240 main.cxx, 1.301, 1.302 splash.cxx , 1.32, 1.33

2009-10-25 Thread Alexis Bory - xiii
leee a écrit : > [...] > If individuals want to spend their time bounty-hunting (although > there's no ca$h bounty, of course) then they're welcome to do so, but > this should not be a concern of the FG project. The only time that > this issue should concern the FG project is when someone tr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main bootstrap.cxx, 1.40 , 1.41 fg_init.cxx, 1.239, 1.240 ma in.cxx, 1.301, 1.302 splash.cxx , 1.32, 1.33

2009-10-24 Thread leee
On Saturday 24 Oct 2009, Nicolas Quijano wrote: [snip...] > Really, really misguided, and it showcases a prevalent > undercurrent with some of our members, who think the GPL means > something else than it really does [...] I think this really sums up the issue here. The GPL isn't there to protec

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main

2009-10-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:32:17 -0400, Nicolas wrote in message <808354800910240732j3a31c2belb37bbcc2a50c8...@mail.gmail.com>: > Erh, he just has to take out said code, and his customers will not be > the wiser, since they won't see the message. > He does read the list after all. > > As Bertrand sa

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main

2009-10-24 Thread Nicolas Quijano
Erh, he just has to take out said code, and his customers will not be the wiser, since they won't see the message. He does read the list after all. As Bertrand said, it's not going to achieve the desired result, not at all. And it's trying to work around the GPL, by doing something different if yo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main bootstrap.cxx, 1.40, 1.41 fg_init.cxx, 1.239, 1.240 main.cxx, 1.301, 1.302 splash.cxx, 1.32, 1.33

2009-10-24 Thread Nicolas Quijano
I'm flabbergasted : disregarding the GPL to protect the GPL ? How novel.. Really, really misguided, and it showcases a prevalent undercurrent with some of our members, who think the GPL means something else than it really does : when something is done that doesn't sit right with their vision of the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main

2009-10-24 Thread Martin Spott
Bertrand Coconnier wrote: > I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight > Gear community wants to go ? These people at Flight Pro Sim are deliberately trying to decieve the FlightGear devlopment 'crew' (just think of their ridiculous attempt of calming the waves by offering

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main bootstrap.cxx, 1.40, 1.41 fg_init.cxx, 1.239, 1.240 main.cxx, 1.301, 1.302 splash.cxx, 1.32, 1.33

2009-10-24 Thread Erik Hofman
Bertrand Coconnier wrote: > Hi all, > > I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight > Gear community wants to go ? > > As far as I understand the GPL, it is legal to rename an application > as long as the renamed application is still under GPL. So what is this > commit inte

[Flightgear-devel] Fwd: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main bootstrap.cxx, 1.40, 1.41 fg_init.cxx, 1.239, 1.240 main.cxx, 1.301, 1.302 splash.cxx, 1.32, 1.33

2009-10-24 Thread Bertrand Coconnier
Hi all, I am bit taken aback by this commit. Is it really where the Flight Gear community wants to go ? As far as I understand the GPL, it is legal to rename an application as long as the renamed application is still under GPL. So what is this commit intended for ? Furthermore, do you honestly th