* gerard robin -- Tuesday 31 March 2009:
> I do accept to be the bad boy of the story ,
That's not what I said or meant to say. But what you are
also not is an innocent victim of bad boys. As far as I
know, nobody wanted or wants to get rid of you. (But then
again, I only read the French forum occ
On mardi 31 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
SNIP
>
> m.
>
No comments.
Sure i am wrong everywhere :) :) :) big, very , very big
laughing...
I do accept to be the bad boy of the story , i don't mind about it, since that
story has not any consequence , on the life of the world ( t
* gerard robin -- Saturday 28 March 2009:
> => it is the consequence of a lot of aggressives behaviour against
> me ( not my work) coming mainly from the French side, like this,
So it's not me, then? Great!
(Yeah, "Franz" comes from Latin "franciscus" -- the French one, but
that doesn't actually
gerard robin wrote:
> On lundi 30 mars 2009, George Patterson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE wrote:
>
> > > If the aircraft is going to be maintained ex-cvs but not maintained
> > > within cvs, then retaining it within cvs just adds another
> > > unmaintained aircraft to the li
On Monday 30 March 2009, George Patterson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE
wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 March 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 01:55 -0700, syd adams wrote:
> >> > I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs
> >> > if gerard will have ma
On lundi 30 mars 2009, George Patterson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE wrote:
> > If the aircraft is going to be maintained ex-cvs but not maintained
> > within cvs, then retaining it within cvs just adds another
> > unmaintained aircraft to the list.
> >
> > While someone, at som
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE wrote:
> On Sunday 29 March 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 01:55 -0700, syd adams wrote:
>> > I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs if
>> > gerard will have maintained versions available ...
>> > Also saves everyone's t
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 01:55 -0700, syd adams wrote:
> I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs if gerard
> will have maintained versions available ...
> Also saves everyone's time down the road trying to explain why it's
> broken and where to get the current version.:)
> Cheers
I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs if gerard will
have maintained versions available ...
Also saves everyone's time down the road trying to explain why it's broken
and where to get the current version.:)
Cheers
--
gerard robin wrote:
> However, i don't mind if they remain in CVS, and like it has been said, i go
> on to update the same models ( not exactly the same content ), with a lot of
> others new Aircrafts which were never committed within CVS ( because not well
> advanced , or not FG 1.9 compatib
Hello,
I take acknowledge of the Curt mail about my whitdraw from the CVS, and of the
different answers to his question.
When i sent the mal to Curt , which inform him that i will not longer
maintain the CVS models ( from me) , my target was ONLY to ask him to delete
my right access , in order
: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Remove right access to CVS FlightGear/data
Referencing the attached email from Gerard Robin who has a number of his
aircraft included in FlightGear CVS. He has indicated to me that he is no
longer interested in maintaining the CVS versions of these aircraft. This
puts us on an
right access to CVS FlightGear/data
Referencing the attached email from Gerard Robin who has a number of his
aircraft included in FlightGear CVS. He has indicated to me that he is no
longer interested in maintaining the CVS versions of these aircraft. This puts
us on an awkward position
Curt
Leave them in CVS for now. Perhaps someone will be interested enough to
adopt one or more of the orphans and give them a bit of TLC. If not well
they will wither and die over time. No harm done either way.
Pity that such a talented member of the development team should choose to
beco
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Referencing the attached email from Gerard Robin who has a number of
> his aircraft included in FlightGear CVS.
> Should we leave these aircraft in CVS as unmaintained entities that
> will accumulate cruftiness and work less and less well as FlightGear
> development goes f
Referencing the attached email from Gerard Robin who has a number of his
aircraft included in FlightGear CVS. He has indicated to me that he is no
longer interested in maintaining the CVS versions of these aircraft. This
puts us on an awkward position. Should we leave these aircraft in CVS as
un
16 matches
Mail list logo
