Hi, Martin Spott wrote:
> To be precise: We _do_ have an accurate 'standalone' shoreline, but the > available landcover data comes from a different source and doesn't > match this shoreline. The process to get these issues ruled out is > tedious but I think we're on track. I'd like to give you an idea what I'm talking about. It's not an easy challenge to get different parties' expectations under one single hood, but things look promising. Still a huge pile of things to do, progress is slow but steady. As a first obviously _visble_ effect of what we're trying to prepare, the Landcover DB has found a new home: http://flightgear.telascience.org/ .... also known as: http://mapserver.flightgear.org/ The contents is largely the same as before (some layer names have seen closer specification, other VMap1 layers, that have been empty before, now contain data). Special thanks go to John Graham and Norman Vine for their support - not only by providing the computing resources but notably by endorsing the whole idea. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
