Certainly - git _is_ easy! (well, sometimes...)
Torsten
Am 13.12.2011 20:53, schrieb Curtis Olson:
Thanks to all who responded! Turned out to be a lot easier than I was
expecting. :-)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Anders Gidenstam
mailto:anders-...@gidenstam.org>> wrote:
On Tue, 13
Thanks to all who responded! Turned out to be a lot easier than I was
expecting. :-)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Anders Gidenstam
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have a quick question for the git experts among us. I've done some
> > googling, but
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a quick question for the git experts among us. I've done some
> googling, but I must not have my search query phrased exactly right, or
> maybe I don't quite know the right git terminology for what I want to do.
> Hopefully it's simpl
Am 13.12.2011 20:19, schrieb Curtis Olson:
Hey all,
I have a quick question for the git experts among us. I've done some
googling, but I must not have my search query phrased exactly right,
or maybe I don't quite know the right git terminology for what I want
to do. Hopefully it's simple en
On Tuesday 13 December 2011 13:19:25 Curtis Olson wrote:
> I have a local project here that uses git and has a single master branch.
>
> I had a wild and crazy idea that I wanted to explore, but knew it would
> involve a lot of code refactoring and rearchitecting -- I didn't want to
> mess up my
Hey all,
I have a quick question for the git experts among us. I've done some
googling, but I must not have my search query phrased exactly right, or
maybe I don't quite know the right git terminology for what I want to do.
Hopefully it's simple enough.
I have a local project here that uses git
6 matches
Mail list logo
