> Jon,
>
> Ron Jensen suggested this idea as a solution for the multiple FDM
> subtrees. It seems to work fine in FlightGear. Would it also work for
> your multiple FDM work in JSBSim/CVS?
Anders (and Ron),
I'll test this out as soon as I can. It may be a few days.
Jon
Index: src/FDM/JSBSim/F
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again -
> which is not ready, but which should be innocuous. Apparently it's not. Did
> you use the JSBSim.cxx from JSBSim CVS? I think I can fix this fairly
> easily.
Jon,
Ron Jensen s
It's working again. Thanks! :D
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> >>> Btw Jon:
> >>> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
> >>
> >> Here, too.
> >
>
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
>>> Btw Jon:
>>> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
>>
>> Here, too.
>
> This is a result of my experimenting with the mul
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> > Btw Jon:
> > Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
>
> Here, too.
This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again -
which is not ready, bu
June 24, 2009 11:48 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear
update that fixed the screens
> Rather long title, eh? :D
> I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
> ic
> Rather long title, eh? :D
> I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
> ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
> That's all.
> Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables.
> They stop in that error.
Hmm something in JSBSim has changed that
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> > Btw Jon:
> > Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
>
> Here, too.
>
> > I also think JSBSim in FlightGear is creating initfile.xml:s again,
> has
> > anyone else s
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> Btw Jon:
> Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
Here, too.
> I also think JSBSim in FlightGear is creating initfile.xml:s again, has
> anyone else seen that?
Yes, doi
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
> Rather long title, eh? :D
> I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
> ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
> That's all.
> Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables.
> They stop in that error.
It
o:victhor.fos...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:03 PM
>> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear
>> update that fixed the screens
>>
>> Rather long title, eh? :D
>>
ct: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear
> update that fixed the screens
>
> Rather long title, eh? :D
> I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
> ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
> That's
Rather long title, eh? :D
I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property,
ice/wing in Table definition is not defined."
That's all.
Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables.
They stop in that error.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
