Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat runways, taxiways and atc

On Saturday 02 February 2008, Thomas Förster wrote: > Am Freitag 01 Februar 2008 schrieb till busch: > > hi, > > > > i have reworked the apt.dat-loading code. everything works fine so far, > > but i have two questions: > > > > 1. we currently have runways and taxiways in one FGRunwayList. imho thes

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat runways, taxiways and atc

Am Freitag 01 Februar 2008 schrieb till busch: > hi, > > i have reworked the apt.dat-loading code. everything works fine so far, but > i have two questions: > > 1. we currently have runways and taxiways in one FGRunwayList. imho these > are very different things. i'd like to make two separate lists

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat runways, taxiways and atc

On Feb 1, 2008 8:31 PM, till busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. we currently have runways and taxiways in one FGRunwayList. imho these are > very different things. i'd like to make two separate lists. are the taxiways > from apt.dat used at all? maybe for groundnetwork? what else should i take

[Flightgear-devel] apt.dat runways, taxiways and atc

hi, i have reworked the apt.dat-loading code. everything works fine so far, but i have two questions: 1. we currently have runways and taxiways in one FGRunwayList. imho these are very different things. i'd like to make two separate lists. are the taxiways from apt.dat used at all? maybe for g