On 7/17/07, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with the observations and suggestions that John made. I also
agree that the development process isn't really broken, but there is
frustration with the slow pace of releases. FlightGear is not a huge
project, but it is pretty big and faces
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Tim Moore wrote:
>Some projects with which I've been involved use a system of time-boxed
>releases. For example, every 2 months a branch is made from the main
>source tree and becomes a release, ready or not. Automatic testing helps
>with this strategy -- of course it helps in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Denker wrote:
> On 07/16/2007 01:10 PM, Stuart Buchanan made a number of excellent points:
>
>> A far better approach is to look at how we can make our processes
>> more efficient so that the management (of which you are the CEO) can
>> make bet
On 07/16/2007 01:10 PM, Stuart Buchanan made a number of excellent points:
> A far better approach is to look at how we can make our processes
> more efficient so that the management (of which you are the CEO) can
> make better use of their time. I think what is required is more
> delegation.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
