Hi All,
I've just pushed two fixes for possible memory leaks in random
vegetation and buildings.
One was noticed by valgrind, the other is speculative, to make use of
osg::ref_ptrs where
possible.
At the same time, I've changed the random vegetation so that the
normals are bound
per-vertex rather
>
> OK, this is fixed in simgear. I also adjusted the code to show the
> message only once.
>
Thanks Erik! I'll give it a go tonight.
d.
--
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 20:05 +0100, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Using the following command line options, I am seeing a dramatic increase in
> memory consumption, in just a few seconds, up to the point where flightgear
> becomes unusable (top reporting that flightgear uses more than 85% of m
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:00:42 +0100
Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Using the following command line options, I am seeing a dramatic increase in
> memory consumption, in just a few seconds, up to the point where flightgear
> becomes unusable (top reporting that flightgear uses more than 85% of
"Me too" with the f-14b as of today or very recently.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Using the following command line options, I am seeing a dramatic increase
> in memory consumption, in just a few seconds, up to the point where
> flightgear becomes unusable (top
Hi All,
Using the following command line options, I am seeing a dramatic increase in
memory consumption, in just a few seconds, up to the point where flightgear
becomes unusable (top reporting that flightgear uses more than 85% of memory on
a 4 GiG linux box):
fgfs --timeofday=dawn --airport=S
Hi All,
Using the following command line options, I am seeing a dramatic increase in
memory consumption, in just a few seconds, up to the point where flightgear
becomes unusable (top reporting that flightgear uses more than 85% of memory on
a 4 GiG linux box):
fgfs --timeofday=dawn --airport=S
--- Tim Moore wrote:
> Markus Zojer wrote:
> | Hi everyone,
> |
> | A memory leak ran over me with fg + sg cvs/OSG 2.3.1 using SDL/osgviewer.
> |
> | It accumulates about 200mb/ 10 min, until your memory and swap is full,
> | despite the 15mb/10min of the unleaked version.
> |
> | I narrowed the se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Zojer wrote:
| Hi everyone,
|
| A memory leak ran over me with fg + sg cvs/OSG 2.3.1 using SDL/osgviewer.
|
| It accumulates about 200mb/ 10 min, until your memory and swap is full,
| despite the 15mb/10min of the unleaked version.
|
| I narrowe
Hi everyone,
A memory leak ran over me with fg + sg cvs/OSG 2.3.1 using SDL/osgviewer.
It accumulates about 200mb/ 10 min, until your memory and swap is full,
despite the 15mb/10min of the unleaked version.
I narrowed the search: with fg + sg cvs from 5th of jan. there is no
leak, while it is
John Denker wrote:
> On 02/05/2007 07:55 PM, Durk Talsma wrote:
>
>> I've never seen any memory leaks that bad.
>>
>
>
> Could you please try it with the simulator /paused/?
>
>
> A rather steady leak of 2 meg per minute is observed chez moi during pause,
> no matter whether the aircraft i
On 02/05/2007 07:55 PM, Durk Talsma wrote:
> I've never seen any memory leaks that bad.
Could you please try it with the simulator /paused/?
A rather steady leak of 2 meg per minute is observed chez moi during pause,
no matter whether the aircraft is aloft or parked on the ground. Vastly
less
My version of fgfs has a rather large memory leak.
If I leave the thing parked after a flight, brakes on,
simulator paused, it will gobble up about 3 gigabytes
of virtual memory overnight. (In contrast, it's only
a little over 500 meg after a few minutes of flight.)
I'm running the version of fg
>From: Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],FlightGear developers discussions
>
>To: FlightGear developers discussions
>
>Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:43:55 +0100
>
>On Wednesday 21 June 2006 08:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 08:35, dene maxwell wrote:
> >From: Torsten Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions
> >
> >To: FlightGear developers discussions
> >
> >Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak
> >Date: W
>From: Torsten Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions
>
>To: FlightGear developers discussions
>
>Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:58:31 +0200
>
>If this is of any help - starting with
If this is of any help - starting with the ufo on the ground and sitting there
(no movement, controls untouched) the memory grows at a rate of approx.
50kB-100kB per second. Monitored for about a minute.
.fgfsrc is blank and all rendering options unchecked, except "display
framerate"
This is on
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 08:19, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Dave Perry
>
> > I have had lock-ups on longer X-C flights with the pa24-250
> > recently that could be from a memory leak. So I used the
> > system monitor to check on VM growth. The only 2D pannel
> > used in the pa24-250 is the radio stack
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions
>
>To: "'FlightGear developers discussions'"
>
>Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:19:03 +0100
>
>
>Dave Perry
>
> > I have had lock-ups on
Dave Perry
> I have had lock-ups on longer X-C flights with the pa24-250 recently
> that could be from a memory leak. So I used the system monitor to check
> on VM growth. The only 2D pannel used in the pa24-250 is the radio
> stack. So I tried commenting out various components of the radio
I have had lock-ups on longer X-C flights with the pa24-250 recently
that could be from a memory leak. So I used the system monitor to check
on VM growth. The only 2D pannel used in the pa24-250 is the radio
stack. So I tried commenting out various components of the radio stack
in the file
It was suggested on IRC that I might like to do memory leak tests on
098a/Win Meresults;
*Start***Finish*
Plane: Time:Mem: Time: Mem:
PA28-161 12:34NZST 548.4M13:03 558.4M
Hunter 13:04NZST 543.4M13:35
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 16:44 +0100, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Lee Elliott wrote
>
> >
> > On Saturday 17 June 2006 20:18, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > > Lee
> > >
> > > > On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > > * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> > > > > > Is anyone
Lee Elliott wrote
>
> On Saturday 17 June 2006 20:18, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > Lee
> >
> > > On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> > > > > Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
> > > >
> > > > I would be surpris
On Saturday 17 June 2006 20:18, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Lee
>
> > On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> > > > Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
> > >
> > > I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 17 June 2006 21:23:
> The only recent change to the 2D panel was IIRC my patch to allow other
> fonts than just Helvetica.txf and led.txf. I'll try to reproduce and
> check if that's the cause, and fix it if so.
Can't reproduce. You might want to try with that last cha
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 17 June 2006 21:18:
> I just left the KC135 running airborne - it chewed up VM and finally froze.
> 2D panel as well. I'm not clear if this is the same phenomenon that you are
> seeing, or if the 2D panel is significant.
The only recent change to the 2D panel was IIRC m
Lee
>
> On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> > > Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
> >
> > I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short
> > test with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ...
On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> > Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
>
> I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short
> test with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ... i didn't
> see anyt
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short test
with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ... i didn't see anything
like you observed. The memory consumption was quite stable a
Hello all,
Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
After using all my real ram fg starts gobbling through VM at
about 1 mb every 5 seconds or so, even when flying around the
same area.
LeeE
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-
31 matches
Mail list logo
