On lundi 12 janvier 2009, Stefan Seifert wrote:
>
> I think this is a very good example of why regular releases are good.
>
> When the next release is already in sight, the pressure to push "huge
> updates" into maintenance releases lowers considerably. So, yes, it would
> be nice to have a much b
On Monday 12 January 2009 15:29:43 gerard robin wrote:
> On lundi 12 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> >
> > True, but this requires a base package update to work correctly. Which
> > is better to delay a few days so the binary only bugfix release can get
> > released.
>
> Ouups
> sorry i thought
On lundi 12 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > I could be wrong but Ron gave, with the FGPiston update, a c172 Engine
> > update (eng_io320.xml) .
> > According to the result it is very accurate.
>
> True, but this requires a base package update to work correctly. Which
> is
gerard robin wrote:
> I could be wrong but Ron gave, with the FGPiston update, a c172 Engine update
> (eng_io320.xml) .
> According to the result it is very accurate.
True, but this requires a base package update to work correctly. Which
is better to delay a few days so the binary only bugfix
On lundi 12 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > Hello Erik,
> > I have just updated within FG CVS the engines regarding the model that i
> > am working on.
> > These engines are now running with the the last update from Ron which is
> > in the JSBSim CVS repo.
> > I guess tha
gerard robin wrote:
> Hello Erik,
> I have just updated within FG CVS the engines regarding the model that i am
> working on.
> These engines are now running with the the last update from Ron which is in
> the JSBSim CVS repo.
> I guess that you were talking about it.
> I can notice that is not
On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >> * Erik Hofman -- Sunday 11 January 2009:
> >>> I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim
> >>> again or would it be better to hold off a bit?
> >>
>
On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >> * Erik Hofman -- Sunday 11 January 2009:
> >>> I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim
> >>> again or would it be better to hold off a bit?
> >>
>
gerard robin wrote:
> On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>> * Erik Hofman -- Sunday 11 January 2009:
>>> I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim
>>> again or would it be better to hold off a bit?
>> If an update means having to update all JSBSim aircraft (con
On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Sunday 11 January 2009:
> > I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim
> > again or would it be better to hold off a bit?
>
> If an update means having to update all JSBSim aircraft (configs),
> then I'd wait u
* Erik Hofman -- Sunday 11 January 2009:
> I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim
> again or would it be better to hold off a bit?
If an update means having to update all JSBSim aircraft (configs),
then I'd wait until we have released 1.9.1 or decided that we
won't release o
On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > Hello Erik,
> > I vote yes , you could update, since these Engine update are very
> > accurate, and necessary.
> > I have some Piston Engine Propellers aircraft which could get profit of
> > it.
>
> I did discover this requi
gerard robin wrote:
> Hello Erik,
> I vote yes , you could update, since these Engine update are very accurate,
> and necessary.
> I have some Piston Engine Propellers aircraft which could get profit of it.
I did discover this requires updates to the engine configuration files
and since there s
On dimanche 11 janvier 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim again or
> would it be better to hold off a bit?
> Ron Jensen did update the engine model quite a bit which is good for
> accuracy but it might introduce a few problems here and there.
>
I was wondering if this would be a good time to update JSBSim again or
would it be better to hold off a bit?
Ron Jensen did update the engine model quite a bit which is good for
accuracy but it might introduce a few problems here and there.
Erik
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
