* Stuart Buchanan -- Friday 18 January 2008:
> Of course, if we're not planning to make any further plib releases,
> then there is no need for a PLIB data branch :) .
A plan is (only) a plan. We should keep the possibility to
release a version 1.1 with the most annoying bugs of 1.0 fixed.
Aircraft
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> We should now really think about making a plib branch for
> the data -- just named PLIB (no pointless date!). The old
> and unused plib branch (PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029) could be
> removed. It doesn't contain anything useful. I guess it's
> safe to assume that no more plib
We should now really think about making a plib branch for
the data -- just named PLIB (no pointless date!). The old
and unused plib branch (PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029) could be
removed. It doesn't contain anything useful. I guess it's
safe to assume that no more plib based release will be made
(except m
3 matches
Mail list logo