Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build failed in Hudson: FlightGear-next-mac #233

2010-10-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:51:23 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message : > On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote: > > > Gene, > > > > I'm a little confused by these emails. As best as I can tell they > > simply report that nothing has changed in git. Do we really need > > this posted to flightgear-

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build failed in Hudson: FlightGear-next-mac #233

2010-10-16 Thread Gene Buckle
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote: > Gene, > > I'm a little confused by these emails. As best as I can tell they simply > report that nothing has changed in git. Do we really need this posted to > flightgear-devel? > > $ git whatchanged --no-abbrev -M --pretty=raw > 9f9e86a61e1313963c9b961

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build failed in Hudson: FlightGear-next-mac #233

2010-10-16 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> Gene, > > I'm a little confused by these emails. As best as I can tell they simply > report that nothing has changed in git. Do we really need this posted to > flightgear-devel? Probably it's a bug that nothing has changed and the script wants to tell us to be more active in development !? T

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build failed in Hudson: FlightGear-next-mac #233

2010-10-16 Thread Curtis Olson
Gene, I'm a little confused by these emails. As best as I can tell they simply report that nothing has changed in git. Do we really need this posted to flightgear-devel? $ git whatchanged --no-abbrev -M --pretty=raw 9f9e86a61e1313963c9b961ed390cee3e967c659..9f9e86a61e1313963c9b961ed390cee3e967c