On 10/05/2012 05:53 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Andy is still around, but inactive. It might be possible to run stuff by him
> once in a while.
He even reads the mailing list (but not the forums) on occasion. :)
Indeed, I'm busy with other things these days, but am still broadly
happy to answer qu
Am 05.10.2012 12:53, schrieb James Turner:
> On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
>
>> When you do that code reading (as I do it currently for the engines) it
>> appears that at least some crucial parts are not such a woodoo and it
>> appears that adding features to improve the FDM capabilit
James wrote,
> -Original Message-
> From: James Turner [mailto:zakal...@mac.com]
> Sent: 05 October 2012 11:54
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] YASim and documentation
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
>
On 10/05/2012 12:53 PM, James Turner wrote:
> Otherwise I worry, given the nature of the solver, we'll keep
> optimising the solver for some aircraft, and making other existing
> aircraft worse - until someone tests them, and announced that they're
> no longer working. James
Would it be possible
On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
> When you do that code reading (as I do it currently for the engines) it
> appears that at least some crucial parts are not such a woodoo and it
> appears that adding features to improve the FDM capabilities is not such
> a crazy idea. For that we w
5 matches
Mail list logo
