Martin Spott wrote:
is already in the works. I've already started designing a plan on
how to convince Jon :-)
I've yet to investigate the GIS stuff in mysql.
Jon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
"Norman Vine" wrote:
>> Until I get chance to add that you can actually search by partial
>> lat/lon - so for example searching with lat=50.1 would return everything
>> from 51.0 to 51.9
>
> repeat after me PostGIS PostGIS ... :-)
is already in the works. I've already started
Martin Spott wrote:
> Josh Babcock wrote:
>
>
>>Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
>>file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
>>be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
>
> [...]
>
> but this s
Norman Vine wrote:
Jon Stockill writes:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
A search by position bounding box would be really cool.
Until I get chance to add that you can actually search by partial
lat/lon - so for example searching with lat=50.1 would return everything
from 51.0 to 51.9
Jon Stockill writes:
>
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > A search by position bounding box would be really cool.
>
> Until I get chance to add that you can actually search by partial
> lat/lon - so for example searching with lat=50.1 would return everything
> from 51.0 to 51.9
repeat af
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
A search by position bounding box would be really cool.
Until I get chance to add that you can actually search by partial
lat/lon - so for example searching with lat=50.1 would return everything
from 51.0 to 51.9
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Quoting Jon Stockill :
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> > There is the object database browser for that :
> > http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/objects.php
> >
> > You can enter a filter to restrict the list and then visually compare
> longitude
> > and latitude.
>
> If you look up the objects you want to r
Jon Stockill schrieb:
dene maxwell wrote:
Unfortunately Jon has his FGFSDB email disabledwhat forum do we
contact him on?
I do?
Hi Jon,
not really but very hidden!!!
I also asked some time ago on this list for your eMail when I wanted to
inform you about the corrupted Finland files (tha
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] replacing existing objects in fgfsdb
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:05:40 + (UTC)
Dene,
"dene maxwell" wrote:
[...]
> Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="JonStockill Email.jpg"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: bas
Dene,
"dene maxwell" wrote:
[...]
> Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="JonStockill Email.jpg"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="JonStockill Email.jpg"
Do you really think you're getting new friends by posting such images
to the list ?
Martin.
-
dene maxwell wrote:
Yeap you do refer attached or
[Snip]
Name: Jon Stockill
EMail: *disabled*
I'm primarily interested in bulk population of the objects database from
various data sources - if you have access to such a resource then I'd be
happy to help you import it.
Models will usually b
Yeap you do refer attached or
[Snip]
Name: Jon Stockill
EMail: *disabled*
I'm primarily interested in bulk population of the objects database from
various data sources - if you have access to such a resource then I'd be
happy to help you import it.
Models will usually be the types of object
Jon Stockill wrote:
If you look up the objects you want to replace as described above and
let me know the numbers in brackets (that's the FAA or FCC id) then it
makes replacing the objects VERY easy.
Apologies for the duplicate - I managed to run out of RAM and kill
thunderbird while it was
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
There is the object database browser for that :
http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/objects.php
You can enter a filter to restrict the list and then visually compare longitude
and latitude.
If you look up the objects you want to replace as described above and
let me know the n
dene maxwell wrote:
Unfortunately Jon has his FGFSDB email disabledwhat forum do we
contact him on?
I do?
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Selon Martin Spott:
Josh Babcock wrote:
Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
[...]
Unfortunately Jon has his FGFSDB email disabledwhat forum do we contact
him on?
Dene
From: Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Josh Babcock wrote:
> Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
> file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects shoul
Selon Martin Spott:
> Josh Babcock wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
> > file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
> > be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
> [...]
>
> but this so
Josh Babcock wrote:
> Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
> file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
> be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
[...]
but this solution implements a really dirty ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
