On 05.02.2011, at 21:21, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> Matthias Melcher wrote:
>>> Hmm, you should only be including Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H,
>>> not Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H.
>>
>> Which reminds me: can't we move the content of all the
>> Fl_Native_File_Chooser_XXX.H
>> files into the F
Matthias Melcher wrote:
>> Hmm, you should only be including Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H,
>> not Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H.
>
> Which reminds me: can't we move the content of all the
> Fl_Native_File_Chooser_XXX.H
> files into the Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H file?
I investigated
> >>> 1) I include Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H [..]
> >>>
> >>Hmm, you should only be including Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H,
> >>not Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H.
> >
> > I was looking through the docs to see if maybe they guided you to
> > the wrong file, and indeed I see that righ
On 05.02.2011, at 17:31, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> Percy wrote:
>> I have 2 problems with using Fl_Native_File_Chooser on Windows 7 (VS2008):
>>
>> 1) I include Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H but it includes a header
>> file called unistd.h (which is apparently for linux). I commented
>> this out an
>>> 1) I include Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H [..]
>>>
>> Hmm, you should only be including Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H,
>> not Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H.
>
> I was looking through the docs to see if maybe they guided you to
> the wrong file, and indeed I see that right at the
Greg Ercolano wrote:
>> 1) I include Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H but it includes a header
>> file called unistd.h (which is apparently for linux). I commented
>> this out and it compiled fine after that.
>
> Hmm, you should only be including Fl_Native_File_Chooser.H,
> not Fl_Native_
Percy wrote:
> I have 2 problems with using Fl_Native_File_Chooser on Windows 7 (VS2008):
>
> 1) I include Fl_Native_File_Chooser_FLTK.H but it includes a header
> file called unistd.h (which is apparently for linux). I commented
> this out and it compiled fine after that.
Hmm, you should
Hello !
> Why are my labels so ugly on my new system compared to my old system? It
> happens when I use large, italicized, fonts. My old system was Windows XP
> 32 bit running FLTK 1.0.11. The new system is XP 64 bit running FLTK 1.3.
> Both systems have pretty good graphics cards with anti-alias
On 05/02/11 02:49, Mike Werner wrote:
> Why are my labels so ugly on my new system compared to my old system?
> It happens when I use large, italicized, fonts. My old system was
> Windows XP 32 bit running FLTK 1.0.11. The new system is XP 64 bit
> running FLTK 1.3. Both systems have pretty good gr
Mike Werner schrieb:
> Why are my labels so ugly on my new system compared to my old system?
> It happens when I use large, italicized, fonts. My old system was
> Windows XP 32 bit running FLTK 1.0.11. The new system is XP 64 bit
> running FLTK 1.3. Both systems have pretty good graphics cards with
10 matches
Mail list logo