Hi Greg
I got it built!
Thanks so much! I wouldn't have been able to do this without your advice.
Thanks Ian
falling back on 1.3 is good advice and that's what I want to study after
1.0.11
Have a great day guys-Patrick
___
fltk mailing list
fltk@
On 12 Aug 2012, at 15:50, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> Function pointers are syntactically messy, but basically what has
> to happen here is you need to recast the func pointer from the former
> to the latter.
>
> The FLTK line in question currently reads:
>
> return scandir(
On 08/11/12 22:52, Patrick wrote:
> I made all the changes you outlined but I don't fully understand what
> the underlying issue was. Does the older version have trouble with type
> casting with more current compilers?
The newer compilers don't like it if you try to assign
a 64bi
Hi Greg
Thanks for you detailed answer
I was using 1.0 but tried again with 1.0.11 based on your experiences.
I made all the changes you outlined but I don't fully understand what
the underlying issue was. Does the older version have trouble with type
casting with more current compilers?
This
On 08/11/12 17:01, Patrick wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I guess 1.0 does not get much use these days but the code base was only
> 17K lines of code back then. I would like to build it but I am getting
> errors.
Which subversion of 1.0: 1.0.0, 1.0.11..?
I just built 1.0.11, and only
On 12.08.2012, at 02:01, Patrick wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I guess 1.0 does not get much use these days but the code base was only
> 17K lines of code back then. I would like to build it but I am getting
> errors.
You will hit problems. One reason for continuous development is to adapt to new
Hi Everyone
I guess 1.0 does not get much use these days but the code base was only
17K lines of code back then. I would like to build it but I am getting
errors.
I am on Xubuntu and I have complied 1.3 from source without issue.
If I run configure, this message is in there:
X11/extensions/Xd
7 matches
Mail list logo
