On 01/04/12 12:52, David wrote:
> Le 04/01/2012 21:44, Greg Ercolano a écrit :
>> Ya, looks like it's spending a lot of time calling find_child().
>>
>> Apparently I never bothered to implement pointers to keep track
>> of 'next' and 'last' to speed up walking the tree.
>>
>> Will follow up with a fix for that too..
>
> Here a simple patch (I miss the Tree Item array swap for updating
> _next_sibling and maybe somewhere else but the test case works)
> I have not done the prev_sibling optimization.
>
> May be, the other David can test it if it helps.
>
Thanks David, I'll take a look at your patch.
I ran out of time to work on it today due to work,
but will try to find some time tonight.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
