Re: [fltk.bugs] [CRIT] STR #1942: Documentation of API changes

2008-12-02 Thread Fabien Costantini
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942 Version: 1.3-current Seems like it is possible now: We have in the fltk html doc an Chapter H for migrating from 1.1 to 1.3 Maybe it should be updated/completed ? L

Re: [fltk.bugs] [CRIT] STR #1942: Documentation of API changes

2008-08-27 Thread Matthias Melcher
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942 Version: 1.3-current Yes, this should be part of the Doxygen documentation. Silly, but Doxygen does provide a \todo and \deprecated tag which generates a list of thos

Re: [fltk.bugs] [CRIT] STR #1942: Documentation of API changes

2008-08-27 Thread Fabien Costantini
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942 Version: 1.3-current Adding a CHANGES.API file or whatever to maintain the API changes would be also error prone because we could easily forget to update it, while up

[fltk.bugs] [CRIT] STR #1942: Documentation of API changes

2008-04-25 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1942 Version: 1.3-current All API changes in FLTK 1.3 and higher should be documented thoroughly, when/while they are done, for at least two reasons: (1) later documentat