Re: [fltk.bugs] [LOW] STR #1844: fltk1.1.x: Add a clip() method toFl_Group

2007-12-17 Thread Michael Sweet
Stan wrote: >> Greg Ercolano wrote: >>> Michael Sweet wrote: Only a clip on/off method was implemented, as an X,Y,W,H method would not be binary-compatible. >>> Great, much thanks! >>> >>> BTW, I think one of the main issues of the original thread >>> was that the clip should

Re: [fltk.bugs] [LOW] STR #1844: fltk1.1.x: Add a clip() method toFl_Group

2007-12-17 Thread Stan
> Greg Ercolano wrote: > > Michael Sweet wrote: > >> Only a clip on/off method was implemented, as an X,Y,W,H method would not > >> be binary-compatible. > > > > Great, much thanks! > > > > BTW, I think one of the main issues of the original thread > > was that the clip should take into

Re: [fltk.bugs] [LOW] STR #1844: fltk1.1.x: Add a clip() method toFl_Group

2007-12-16 Thread Michael Sweet
Greg Ercolano wrote: > Michael Sweet wrote: >> Only a clip on/off method was implemented, as an X,Y,W,H method would not >> be binary-compatible. > > Great, much thanks! > > BTW, I think one of the main issues of the original thread > was that the clip should take into account t

Re: [fltk.bugs] [LOW] STR #1844: fltk1.1.x: Add a clip() method toFl_Group

2007-12-15 Thread Greg Ercolano
Michael Sweet wrote: > Only a clip on/off method was implemented, as an X,Y,W,H method would not > be binary-compatible. Great, much thanks! BTW, I think one of the main issues of the original thread was that the clip should take into account the current box() type,