DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
Yes, it's a mix of outdated features and bad documentation. This is a
typical case where one idea is abused by "adding just that one little
featu
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
I think the documentation of label symbols can need some more details:
First regarding the fact, that there can be only two symbols at most in a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
The following change seems to fox the case when draw_symbols is off:
Index: src/fl_draw.cxx
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
___
fltk-bugs mailing list
fltk-bugs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
Removed Duplicate Of dependency (hopefully)
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
_
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
___
fltk-bugs mailing list
fltk-bugs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2689
Version: 1.3-current
There's somethng a bit weird going on with the expansion of symbols, in
particualr the "@" symbol, when using fl_draw.
This was initially flagged
