Re: [fltk.development] fl_xid() -- needs docs?

> After reading STR #2696 > it sounded like we should add some docs for fl_xid() > to mention the need for apps to #define FL_INTERNALS. Yes, I think so... > I'm not sure what to write or I'd write it. Hmm, nor do I. > Looks like documenation/src/osissues.do

[fltk.development] Release Schedule on fltk.org (fltk.commit - [WWW] r633 - trunk)

Matt, your Release Schedule on http://www.fltk.org/ is very confusing. What does it mean? On 06.08.2011 10:02, fltk-dev@easysw.com wrote: > Author: matt > Date: 2011-08-06 01:02:41 -0700 (Sat, 06 Aug 2011) > New Revision: 633 > Log: > Updated release schedule > > Modified: > trunk/index.php >

[fltk.development] Fltk3 build issue

Matt, Here's a new one: this is winxx/mingw, though I think I saw this on OSX too (I was not paying attention as the script ran...) === making fluid === Compiling CodeEditor.cxx... In file included from CodeEditor.h:41, from CodeEditor.cxx:36: ../fltk3/TextEditor.h:46: warning:

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2636: notification of clipboard changes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2636 Version: 1.4-feature Attached file "fltk-1_v2.3.x-clipboard-win32-fix.patch"... Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2636 Version: 1.4-featureIndex: fltk-1.3/src/Fl_wi

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2636: notification of clipboard changes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. [STR New] Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2636 Version: 1.4-feature Updated fltk-1.3.x-clipboard-win32-fix.patch, fixes problems with crashes on exit, due to fl_xid(Fl::first_window()). Link: http://www.fltk.org

Re: [fltk.development] Release Schedule on fltk.org (fltk.commit - [WWW] r633 - trunk)

Sorry, it was late and I miss-typed. On 08.08.2011, at 11:04, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > Matt, your Release Schedule on http://www.fltk.org/ is very > confusing. What does it mean? > > On 06.08.2011 10:02, fltk-dev@easysw.com wrote: >> Author: matt >> Date: 2011-08-06 01:02:41 -0700 (Sat, 06

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk3 build issue

Ah, thanks. I was using exception to verify my code. Now should I enable them for fltk3, or should I remove the try-catch-throw? On 08.08.2011, at 11:52, "MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)" wrote: > Matt, > > Here's a new one: this is winxx/mingw, though I think I saw this on OSX > too (I wa

Re: [fltk.development] Fltk3 build issue

> Ah, thanks. I was using exception to verify my code. Now should I enable them > for fltk3, or should I remove the try-catch-throw? I don't know about others, but I'm all for using them. I've always hated having to check function return values and memory blocks and whatnot to make sure variab