DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-feature
Attached file big2.xpm...
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-feature
Attachment: http://www.fltk.org/strfiles/2659/big2.xpm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-feature
I believe the attached test pixmap file big2.xpm is not
correctly displayed with the pixmap_browser test program
under X11 when the patches are
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-feature
Attached file pixmap.patch...
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-featureIndex: src/ps_image.cxx
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2659
Version: 1.4-feature
The attached pixmap.patch gathers all patches considered here
and fixes the issue that appeared with test file big2.xpm.
Should I commit that ?
On 06/29/12 12:48, Greg Ercolano wrote:
On 06/29/12 10:17, Matthias Melcher wrote:
I think that it is a mistake. Even though i show up using Blame.
Makes no sense to me and should be xhanged back. It may have been a
search/replace error.
Cool, I'll apply the fix, but think I'll wait