[STR Closed w/Resolution]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Fix Version: 1.3.0 (r8472)
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Fix Version: 1.3.0 (r8472)
___
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
> I suggest to file another STR when you have a concrete proposal for an
> extension - maybe after a short discussion in
> fltk.development or even in
> fltk.general, asking for input from users what they did
> already, and what
> they would like to have...
Well, on that basis, here's the code
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Pending]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Fix Version: 1.3.0 (r8472)
Fixed in Subversion repository.
The 2nd patch is now in svn (r8472) and ought to be in the next snapshot
within a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR Active]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Since the icon_ variable is a void* and private, we can actually
> re-purpose it to hold something completely differen
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Disclaimer: I don't know what the official ABI policy of FLTK is. My
assumption has been that breaking existing things is a no-no but adding
more
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Well, I may be missing a point, but I don't see any benefit in un-inlining
these methods. I presume that we will need new (i.e. additional) metho
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Updated patch that only does the un-inlining. Could this be acceptable for
1.3 inclusion and any further enhancements could be discussed when act
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Attached file "fltk-1.3.x-hide-icon2.patch"...
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-featureIndex: src/Fl_Window.cxx
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 04:22:06AM -0800, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> On 14.02.2011 09:51, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>
> > I have an X11 bitmap+mask patch, but requires 1 extra member in Fl_Window.
> > would that be an option to post?
> > I believe I'm even not the first one doing so.
>
> Please post
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
Yes, something along the lines of Fl_Image was the plan (possibly with
platform specific convenience functions). And I figured that the "get"
met
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
On Mac OS X, icons can be set in several ways, including the bundle.
Long-term I think a method that takes an Fl_Image and converts it to the
pla
On 14.02.2011 09:51, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> I have an X11 bitmap+mask patch, but requires 1 extra member in Fl_Window.
> would that be an option to post?
> I believe I'm even not the first one doing so.
Please post to the STR form on the web site, either to STR 2563,
if you think that it's relat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
I'd suggest moving it to 1.4 is maybe safer for now... Though could be
persuaded otherwise if there is striong demand.
To be honest, I have alwa
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
One of our goals with the FLTK 1.3 release is API compatibility with FLTK
1.1 as far as possible. Removing a method, as you suggest, to hide
impl
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:12:54AM -0800, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
>
> [STR New]
>
> Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
> Version: 1.3-feature
>
>
> I have on my todo-list to make the icon support in FLTK a bit mor
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW.
[STR New]
Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2563
Version: 1.3-feature
I have on my todo-list to make the icon support in FLTK a bit more
full-featured. The current API is a bit transparent though and might be
very pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
