Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2672: Updated Gleam patch againstFLTK1.3.x-r8816

2011-06-23 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 6/23/11 5:55 AM, Matthias Melcher wrote: > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. INSTEAD, POST ANY RESPONSES TO THE LINK BELOW. > > [STR New] > > Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672 > Version: 1.3-feature > > > I am considering making Gleam 3 the default look for FLTK 3. Would that be > OK?

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2672: Updated Gleam patch againstFLTK1.3.x-r8816

2011-06-23 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
> Link: http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L2672 > Version: 1.3-feature > > > I am considering making Gleam 3 the default look for FLTK 3. > Would that be OK? Fine by me - I quite like the look of it - though the later versions were maybe a bit too curved for my taste... V3 was OK I guess. We do nee

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2672: Updated Gleam patch againstFLTK1.3.x-r8816

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Sweet
Agreed - I like v3 the best so far... On Jun 20, 2011, at 1:38 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: > > >> Here there is the modified version of fl_gleam. I think it >> looks better >> with the gradients on the top and the bottom, so the the >> middle area of >> the widgets it is no

Re: [fltk.development] [RFE] STR #2672: Updated Gleam patch againstFLTK1.3.x-r8816

2011-06-20 Thread MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
> Here there is the modified version of fl_gleam. I think it > looks better > with the gradients on the top and the bottom, so the the > middle area of > the widgets it is no strongly affected. Here an screen shot: > > https://sites.google.com/site/eetorres/fl_gleam > > The new gleam can be