Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandlevery large contents (>10000)]

2012-01-09 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/08/12 04:48, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > Users are encouraged to do something like this in their main program > or wherever they have potential ABI differences: > > if (fl_abi_version() != FL_ABI_VERSION) >fl_abort ("FLTK ABI version mismatch: %d != %d", > fl_abi_version(), FL_ABI_V

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandlevery large contents (>10000)]

2012-01-08 Thread Greg Ercolano
On 01/08/12 04:48, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > This is *not* dependent on linking statically or dynamically! If your > version of the FLTK lib is compiled with another ABI version macro than > you define in your application, then you *have* different ABI versions > in your application. Oh,

Re: [fltk.development] RFC: Handling ABI features [was: STR #2795: Fl_Tree: needs tobeoptimizedtohandlevery large contents (>10000)]

2012-01-08 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
On 08.01.2012 13:48, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > This is *not* dependent on linking statically or dynamically! If your > version of the FLTK lib is compiled with another ABI version macro than > you define in your application, then you *have* different ABI versions > in your application. For an ex