What do you think if we can use T4 to loop through all the domain
model file and generate class map by follow convention over
configuration pattern. For example we can set the prefix for for every
reference type like GId for guid Cmp for component and Ref for
ManyToOne
public class Cargo
{
publi
Yep, looks great. Thanks!
-Nate
On Dec 15, 11:16 am, "Andrew Stewart"
wrote:
> Hi Nate
> Well that was harder than expected but I've just committed a fix for that.
> You can now apply your supertype similar to below:
>
> var autoMapper = AutoPersistenceModel
> .M
That is by design, the idea here is that only one side of the association is
responsible for the associatio
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:25 PM, wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Should adding a parent to a child update the many-to-many table in the
> database? In my current implementation, it seems that adding
I was attempting to get a second level cache up with the Velocity
provider from the Nhib contrib trunk, setting the configure options to
use cache.provider_name("nhibernate.cache.velocity") I ended up
getting assembly not found and I have the provider in my solution and
referenced in my nhib proje
Hello,
Should adding a parent to a child update the many-to-many table in the
database? In my current implementation, it seems that adding a child
to the parent creates a record in the many-to-many table without a
problem, but adding a parent to a child does not persist in the
database. Maybe the
I've also added convention support for Cache too, incase anyone is
interested.
AutoPersistenceModel
.MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf()
.WithConvention(c => c.DefaultCache = cache => cache.AsReadWrite());
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:35 PM, James Gregory wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> It now is available :)
>
>
Hi Marco,
It now is available :)
Let me know how it works out.
public MyClassMap()
{
Cache.AsReadOnly();
Id(x => x.Identity);
}
James
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Marco wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add
>
>
>
> to my Mapping Class. It's not yet available as a typed solution, but
> how
Great!
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:02 PM, James Gregory wrote:
> I've just committed a change so you can now use a lambda for Foreign.
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:09 AM, James Gregory
> wrote:
>>
>> That looks feasible, I'll have a go later.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Chris
I've just committed a change so you can now use a lambda for Foreign.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:09 AM, James Gregory wrote:
> That looks feasible, I'll have a go later.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Chris Constantin
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is it possible to replace:
>> Id(x => x.Id)
>>
Thanks! that solved the problem
On 12 dec, 02:12, "Paul Batum" wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> At the moment the WithLengthOf method will throw an exception if you are not
> mapping a string or a decimal. To be honest I am not exactly sure why this
> behaviour was added - its something that should be loo
I'm trying to add
to my Mapping Class. It's not yet available as a typed solution, but
how can i add this at this moment?
Thanks
Marco
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
NH has its own Generic Enum Mapper BTW
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Derick Bailey wrote:
>
> in NHibernate, the default mapping of an Enum is to an integer (at
> least, I've never told it to do anything special, and it has always
> mapped to my integer columns fine). In FluentNHibernate, the
in NHibernate, the default mapping of an Enum is to an integer (at
least, I've never told it to do anything special, and it has always
mapped to my integer columns fine). In FluentNHibernate, the default
mapping is to a string, because of the GenericEnumMapper class:
namespace FluentNHibernate.Ma
Hi Nate
Well that was harder than expected but I've just committed a fix for that.
You can now apply your supertype similar to below:
var autoMapper = AutoPersistenceModel
.MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf()
.Where(t => t.Namespace ==
"FluentNHibernate
Hi
Just to let you know I'm having a few issues with passing tests, but a patch
is on it's way.
Andy
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:05 AM, James Gregory wrote:
> Also typical, just as I start investigating somebody else answers faster ;)
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Andrew Stewart <
> andrew.
That looks feasible, I'll have a go later.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Chris Constantin wrote:
>
> Is it possible to replace:
> Id(x => x.Id)
>.GeneratedBy.Foreign("User");
> with
> Id(x => x.Id)
>.GeneratedBy.Foreign(x => x.User);
> ?
>
> It would be
Also typical, just as I start investigating somebody else answers faster ;)
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Andrew Stewart <
andrew.stew...@i-nnovate.net> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Someone found that problem then before I got chance to fix it typical :o)
> Basically inorder to Automap inheritence mappi
Hello
Someone found that problem then before I got chance to fix it typical :o)
Basically inorder to Automap inheritence mappings it assumes that your base
object is object if not then it maps it as an inherited joined class.
I'll work on a fix and get it over to you.
Andy
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008
18 matches
Mail list logo
