[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies

2009-01-14 Thread Luis Abreu
+1 for signing and adding the allow partial calllers attribute so that non-signed dlls can still call use the assembly. From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart Sent: terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2009 20:09 To:

[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies

2009-01-14 Thread James Gregory
That's a good call. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Luis Abreu lab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for signing and adding the allow partial calllers attribute so that non-signed dlls can still call use the assembly. *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto:

[fluent-nhib] ITypeConvention.CanHandle(Type)

2009-01-14 Thread ch...@marisic.com
I think ITypeConvention.CanHandle should take the IProperty interface instead of just a type. I have a ITypeConvention implementation public class TypePrependsFieldNameT : ITypeConvention { private readonly string _fieldName; public TypePrependsFieldName(string

[fluent-nhib] Re: ITypeConvention.CanHandle(Type)

2009-01-14 Thread James Gregory
Well, ITypeConvention kind of implies a type, don't you think? :) There's already an IPropertyConvention, which you can probably make use of; there's an AttributeConventionT you could probably use for reference. I've yet to write anything up on it yet though. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:09 PM,

[fluent-nhib] Re: ITypeConvention.CanHandle(Type)

2009-01-14 Thread James Gregory
Brought this back to the list... I'm not too concerned with the current convention interfaces. I need to put some more thought into it, but I see the main problems as: ITypeConvention only operates against property's, which means it's very similar to IPropertyConvention; however, ITypeConvention

[fluent-nhib] Re: ITypeConvention.CanHandle(Type)

2009-01-14 Thread James Gregory
I'm going to expose the IPropertyConvention, then set at creating some more specialised conventions. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:20 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote: Brought this back to the list... I'm not too concerned with the current convention interfaces. I need to put some