Good catch Brendan. I need to pay more attention.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Brendan Erwin wrote:
> He's not testing the actual object created in his example. He's testing the
> Catalog entity which "HasMany" Business entities.
> Here is an example from my project that works:
> [Te
Hi,
I have tried to map a collection of child entities as an array. Can't
figure out what is wrong, as there's no documentation on the subject.
The FNH wiki (http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/
StandardMappingCollectionTypes) says it's just applying .AsArray();
but in reality it is not.
Any ide
He's not testing the actual object created in his example. He's
testing the Catalog entity which "HasMany" Business entities.
Here is an example from my project that works:
[Test]
public void PayerMapping()
{
var states = new List { new State { Abbreviati
I have a similar problem. I'm working with a legacy database so my
mappings have lots of column names specified. However, I'd like to use
conventions for new entities but I find that specifying conventions
overrides things specified in my mappings.
So, +1 on a solution to this.
On Mar 16,
What doesn't work about mapping explicit implementations?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Joshua wrote:
>
> I'm talking about mapping the concrete implementation of a generic
> class:
>
> public class GenericClass
> {
> }
>
> public class ConcreteClass : GenericClass
> {
> }
>
> ConcreteClass
I'm talking about mapping the concrete implementation of a generic
class:
public class GenericClass
{
}
public class ConcreteClass : GenericClass
{
}
ConcreteClass can be mapped with Fluent, but an explicit
implementation of GenericClass, like GenericClass, cannot. The
last example can be done
I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to do with that property, but
automapping has a ForTypesThatDeriveFrom method that you can call
IgnoreProperty inside, which is used to ignore specific properties.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:09 PM, wgp...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks John. I've decided to
Can you elaborate on what exactly you are looking for? An example
class and the associated hbm xml would be most useful.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Joshua wrote:
>
> Is future support for mapping generic types planned?
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
That is not how it works. The PersistenceSpecification does not test
against an object instance that you have created. Here is an example
test from the the ConnectedTester:
[Test]
public void MappingTest1()
{
new PersistenceSpecification(_source)
This isn't exactly what you are asking for, but since you say you are
building a test program...
http://brendanjerwin.github.com/2009/03/11/using-nhibernate-validator-with-fluent-nhibernate.html
Scroll down towards the bottom in the "Bonus" section. You can see how
I manage the schema in Sql
Map(x => x.YourByteArrayHere)
.WithLengthOf(MAX_LENGTH_HERE);
Should work fine if you don't care about the type of the sql column.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Sean Feldman
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I am trying to figure out how to map an array of bytes, and can't find
> an example that would
I think that's the only way currently, yes.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:24 PM, brendanjerwin wrote:
>
> Am I missing the fluent way to get optional=true on the join element?
>
> Is m.SetAttribute("optional","true") the best current way?
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Y
Am I missing the fluent way to get optional=true on the join element?
Is m.SetAttribute("optional","true") the best current way?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to t
I think I've encountered a bug when 'ing two tables using
WithTable() with lambda. Here's what I have.
// Schema
table PODetail
(
PODetailID int identity(1,1) primary key
PONumber varchar(15) foreign key (POHeader) references (PONumber)
UnitOfIssue varchar(2) foreign key (UnitOfIssue) refer
Is future support for mapping generic types planned?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
Thanks John. I've decided to go back to writing the class mappings
myself until the automapping feature matures a bit. Decorating my
domain model with attributes for use only with the AutoPersistence
feature of FNH is in my opinion a violation of concerns.
On Mar 18, 10:26 am, Jon Kruger wrote
Hello guys.
I'm converting some old code I had which used mapping visitors to load and
populate the Configurationn object. I was under the impression that this
code:
var configuration = Fluently.Configure( )
.Database( GetDatabaseInfo() )
.Mappi
You have to put the attribute on the properties that you don't want to map
(if you're using the auto-mapper). The other alternative is to use the
fluent mappings for your class instead (that is, you write the mappings
instead of having the auto-mapper do it for you).
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:22
Thanks. Does the last method in that thread simply not map unmappable
properties/methods ... or do I have to specify all the properties/
methods in each of my classes that I don't want mapped (seems like a
pain).
On Mar 18, 10:15 am, Jon Kruger wrote:
> This thread shows a couple different ways
This thread shows a couple different ways you can ignore properties
(unfortunately it's not baked into FNH):
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/3c338137374971ce
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, wgp...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Example:
>
> I have a helper property
Example:
I have a helper property defined as such, that for a particular
Division object, will return a collection of all its ancestors based
on a parent/child relationship in the db:
List ancestors;
public virtual IList Ancestors
{
get
{
ancestors = ancestors ??
I ran into the same problem yesterday, it definitely does not create the new
folder. I would submit the patch.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:04 AM, MaggiePlusPlus
wrote:
>
> I am using the ExportTo method to obtain a copy of the xml mapping
> files for testing.
>
> Currently if you provide a folder
I am using the ExportTo method to obtain a copy of the xml mapping
files for testing.
Currently if you provide a folder name that does not exist you get an
exception. Is this the expected behavior? I am used to tools creating
a folder if it does not exist, but I realize I do not know what the
be
In that case, do something like this to create your sessions:
_sessionFactory.OpenSession(interceptor);
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:56 AM, epitka wrote:
>
> I know about the events, but I could not find anything there about
> IsTransient flag which lets me control myself whether the entity is
> t
I know about the events, but I could not find anything there about
IsTransient flag which lets me control myself whether the entity is
transient or not. (legacy db, composite keys). This used to be
IsUnsaved and is still in docs as IsUnsaved.
But I thought that expose configuration should allow
I don't know that FNH has support for interceptors, but in NHibernate 2.0
they added events, which are way nicer than using the interceptor. The
event model allows you to hook into a lot more than the interceptor and it
doesn't feel as hacky as the interceptor did.
Here's an example of one event (
Should this work?
_sessionFactory = Fluently.Configure(Configuration)
.Mappings(m =>
m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(Assembly.Load("SR.Domain")))
.Mappings(m =>
m.HbmMappings.AddFromAssembly(Assembly.Load("SR.Domain")))
Hello,
i would like to use PersistenceSpecification in order to test my
mapping.
My mapping is:
public CatalogMap()
{
Id(x => x.Id, "id");
Map(x => x.Name, "name");
HasMany(x => x.Businesses)
.Inverse()
.KeyColumnNames.
Forgot to check if property is ReadOnly this code would be more
appropriate:
if (property.CanWrite)
{
if (property.PropertyType.IsEnum)
return true;
return property.PropertyType.Namespace == "System";
}
On 18 mar., 14:42, "gre...@slavec.net" wrote:
> The problem is
The problem is in method MapsProperty of class AutomMapColumn
This line:
if (property.CanWrite)
return property.PropertyType.Namespace == "System";
will return false for enums and they will therefore be skipped.
I think a check if a type is an enum should be added before this line,
like t
Looks like this answers my post a moment ago
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/349a341625971306
Andrew
On Mar 18, 12:43 pm, "gre...@slavec.net" wrote:
> Enums members in entities are skipped when automaping is used.
>
> I found this test in AutoMap tests:
>
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how to map an array of bytes, and can't find
an example that would clearly show that. Do I need to map it as a
custom type?
Thank you
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"F
Enums members in entities are skipped when automaping is used.
I found this test in AutoMap tests:
[Test]
public void ShouldAutoMapEnums()
{
Model(model => model
.ForTypesThatDeriveFrom(mapping =>
mapping.Map(x => x.Enum).SetAttrib
OK adding this make everything work as I want, but enums still aren't
mapped by default. Seems to be because enums dont end up as IProperty
(as per EnumerationPropertyConvention) but are in fact an IUserType
Andrew
public class EnumMappingConvention : IUserTypeConvention
{
In a recent previous version of FNH i hacked FNH/Mapping/
EnumerationTypeConvention, replacling this line:
Type mapperType = typeof(GenericEnumMapper<>).MakeGenericType
(propertyMapping.PropertyType);
with this:
Type mapperType = propertyMapping.PropertyType;
to make my enums be saved as Ints
You should read up on HQL and the Criteria API, you can specify on a
per-query basis a lot of things. http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html
As for in the mappings, there is LazyLoad() and Not.LazyLoad()
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Tom Warnat wrote:
>
> I use a single seassion (open an
I use a single seassion (open and close) for getting a product within
a program that references my mappings.
I theres no way to set for that single session lazyload = false i will
do it in the mapping.
The SetAttribute("lazy", "false") was part of my mappings though. But
it does not work.
On 18
What do you mean for a single session? As far as mappings are concerned, you
either set it or you don't.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Tom Warnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> is there a way to set for a single session LazyLoad = false?
>
>
>
> I tried to set it with SetAttribute(“lazy”, “false”) for
Hi,
is there a way to set for a single session LazyLoad = false?
I tried to set it with SetAttribute("lazy", "false") for all my session, but
it does not seem to work.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Yes, as Paul said, there's nothing stopping you using a property that access
a private field; that's all handled through the standard NHibernate
access-strategy stuff.
What we don't have support for is just standalone fields, with no property
access at all. This is because of proliferation of Prope
40 matches
Mail list logo
