Awesome!
On May 15, 7:03 pm, James Gregory wrote:
> It most definitely is not a fork :)
> It's a completely independent project that utilises NHibernate, but is no
> way tied to its code-base (any more than any other user of NH is).
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ben Harper wrote:
>
>
Your forgot to add - A very "sexy" completly independent project!
On May 15, 7:03 pm, James Gregory wrote:
> It most definitely is not a fork :)
> It's a completely independent project that utilises NHibernate, but is no
> way tied to its code-base (any more than any other user of NH is).
>
> On
The solution is defining concrete type
.ForTypesThatDeriveFrom(a => a.Map( f => f.Photo ).CustomTypeIs(
typeof(Byte[]) ))
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Steven Harman wrote:
> I would /imagine/ you'll need to use a more basic data structure if you
> want multi-db support. i.e.
>
> public clas
It most definitely is not a fork :)
It's a completely independent project that utilises NHibernate, but is no
way tied to its code-base (any more than any other user of NH is).
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ben Harper wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've just come across Fluent, after struggling for a while
Hi,
that's the problem I also run into. I mentioned it in
http://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/issues/detail?id=104 but
it's worth creating a distinct Issue.. Ok I won't procratinate any
longer and create one ;).
http://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/issues/detail?id=231
I use the sam
Hi,
I've just come across Fluent, after struggling for a while with
NHibernate's existing XML junk, and I love it.
Anyway - This might be a dumb question, but I need to know for sure --
Is Fluent a fork of NHibernate, or is it developed in parallel to
NHibernate? Specifically, the core business
I would /imagine/ you'll need to use a more basic data structure if you want
multi-db support. i.e.
public class Photo
{
public string MimeType { get; set; }
public byte[] Content { get; set; }
}
and then map that as a sub-component. That's just my gut-feel... but I think
we'll be doing somet
Hi!. This is a simply question. How can I automap a property of type Image?
I have this class:
public class Student: Entity
{
public virtual string Name{ get; set; }
public virtual Image Photo{ get; set; }
}
And I'm creating the session factory with this:
var persistenceModel =
I have missed bottom part of this article - about the Reveal static
class which does more or less what I do in my hack. The only
difference is that it works on non-public properties and my hack uses
non-public fields.
Anyway - I am another person which is interested in doing that this
way since i
If your column name is always tied to your class name, then you could just
do a typeof(FirstName).Name in the Map() column name overload.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Rob wrote:
>
> Thanks Hudson! Pretty good for off the top of the head.
>
> I do see that your solution gives me a column nam
Your override is definitely a way to do it. In fact, I was thinking of
pushing that in at a future date. I use something similar as a custom
override for our production use of FNH, but I was hesitant to push that to
trunk for fear that I was the only one interested in doing that ;)
Alternatively, y
Sure, but WhatEver has to be public in this case. So it exposes
internal collection which I'd like to avoid.
On 15 Maj, 14:07, Rei wrote:
> Wasn't it easier to just HasMany(p => p.WhatEver).Access.AsField ? Or
> did I totally fubar the interpretation of the problem?
>
> On May 15, 12:53 am, cyb
Thanks Hudson! Pretty good for off the top of the head.
I do see that your solution gives me a column name of value in the
Person Table, I know I could add the column name as a field in the
cFirstName.Map(z =>z.value, "FirstName") call, but do you know of a
way to get the syntactic sugar of stat
Actually, looking at the syntax again, it should be more like this:
Component(x=>x.theName,
cName => cName.Component(y => y.theFirstName, cFirstName =>
cFirstName.Map(z => z.value)));
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Hudson Akridge wrote:
> When you map the FirstName component, specify .Map(x =>
When you map the FirstName component, specify .Map(x => x.value);
So, it'll look something like this:
.Component(cName => cName.Component(fName => fName.Map(x => x.value)));
It's a close approx =p Not at a computer atm where I could give you an
exact, but I think that's pretty close to what you ne
Apologies if this has been answered before. My search-fu has failed
me (I did see an issue related to nested components, but it didn't
seem to be what I was looking for...). I'm looking to map the
following (somewhat contrived but simplier to understand scenario):
class Person
{
Name theNam
There's a couple of other instances like this out there. It's
purely inconsistencies with the interfaces at this point. We've talked about
it before on the dev boards, and the resolution seemed to be, the
Conventions were going to get a facelift. Rather than giving you a model
class/interface back
Funnily enough, we've been discussing the topic of ordering conventions in a
fluent, generic way because "we haven't had any complaints yet but..." I
guess you broke that silence. :)
I think for now you'll have to continue providing exceptions on your
conventions. As far as detecting if Inverse has
Apologies if this has been answered before. My search-fu has failed
me (I did see an issue related to nested components, but it didn't
seem to be what I was looking for...). I'm looking to map the
following (somewhat contrived but simplier to understand scenario):
class Person
{
Name theNam
Ok I solved it myself. Problem was that I have a reference convention
and it kicks in after the override. Exclude components from reference
collection and now everything works.
Luca Lusetti
On May 14, 10:28 am, Luca Lusetti wrote:
> Hi, I have this scenario
>
> public class Comune
> {
>
Wasn't it easier to just HasMany(p => p.WhatEver).Access.AsField ? Or
did I totally fubar the interpretation of the problem?
On May 15, 12:53 am, cyberhubert wrote:
> Hi nHibernate Heroes ;)
> I have to ask you about it since I think/google about it for some time
> and still have no consistent a
Thanks for your help, it was just an oversight on my part. I'm caching
the session factory now so that should hopefully resolve it
On May 15, 8:06 am, Paul Batum wrote:
> When you use Fluently.Configure(), it builds a session factory. When it
> comes to figuring out what to do with that session
Hi nHibernate Heroes ;)
I have to ask you about it since I think/google about it for some time
and still have no consistent answer.
My problem is in fluent mapping collections.
What I need is custom collection with proper business rule handling on
Add/Remove etc.What I don't want is inheriting/imp
Hi,
Most of my collection mappings are inverse so I have a
IHasManyConvention that sets Inverse(). For the types that I don't
want inverse (incidentally these are element-type collections that the
automapper doesn't seem to support), I have IAutoMappingOverride's in
place that call "Not.Inverse()
I worked around this by using an override:
...ForTypesThatDeriveFrom(map => map.HasMany(x => x.Rights).AsSet
().AsElement("`right`"))...
It would be nice if automappings detected element mappings
automagically though...
On May 13, 7:47 pm, Mike wrote:
> Haven't figured out how to setup automap
Hi,
I'm writing a IReferenceConvention and would like to set the not-null
and foreign-key properties, but I find those missing from
IManyToOnePart - is there any specific reason for this, or is it just
that noone has gotten around yet? I added the methods to
IManyToOnePart and everything seems to
When you use Fluently.Configure(), it builds a session factory. When it
comes to figuring out what to do with that session factory, its best to
follow typical NH best practices because once you have a session factory,
theres nothing "fluent" about it.
An old but quite popular article on NH best pr
27 matches
Mail list logo
