Thanks Karron, I'd never thought of that situation. I've applied your patch,
good work!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Karron Qiu wrote:
> Here is my patch for ExposeConfiguration, please have a look.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Karron Qiu wrote:
> > Sorry for my bad English, that c
Here is my patch for ExposeConfiguration, please have a look.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Karron Qiu wrote:
> Sorry for my bad English, that confused you.
>
> I have two reasons here.
>
> 1. ExposeConfiguration method can't be called many times. It's an
> delegate , not a list that contains
Sorry for my bad English, that confused you.
I have two reasons here.
1. ExposeConfiguration method can't be called many times. It's an
delegate , not a list that contains delegates. If I call this method
many times, only the last one will be executed. Because I have some
plugins for nh initiali
Ribbit! Ribbit!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:16 AM, James Gregory wrote:
> Right, the constructor change is in. You can now do this:
> var cfg = new Configuration();
>
> Fluently.Configure(cfg)
> .blah();
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, James Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> Calm it Kermit. I'm not
Right, the constructor change is in. You can now do this:
var cfg = new Configuration();
Fluently.Configure(cfg)
.blah();
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, James Gregory wrote:
> Calm it Kermit. I'm not against having a constructor overload, I'll do
> that next time I'm in there.
>
> As for e
Calm it Kermit. I'm not against having a constructor overload, I'll do
that next time I'm in there.
As for exposing the property, I'd prefer not to because it's polluting
the API, but I'm not that fussed. All I wanted to know was why he said
he couldn't use the ExposeConfiguration; not didn't wan
Just wanted to add that I recognise you can get a reference to it using
Tuna's trick with the closure but I think its highly unintuitive.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Paul Batum wrote:
> James, is there a reason you don't want to expose the Configuration? What
> if someone wants to do someth
James, is there a reason you don't want to expose the Configuration? What if
someone wants to do something with it after the session factory is built? It
seems perfectly reasonable to me for the getter to be public.
Also, I wanted to add an overload to Fluently.Configure that takes an
existing Con
Why can't you use the ExposeConfiguration method? Some explanation would
help.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Karron Qiu wrote:
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Tuna Toksoz wrote:
> > Configuration cfg;
> > var fconfig=Fluently.Configure().ExposeConf
Thank you.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Tuna Toksoz wrote:
> Configuration cfg;
> var fconfig=Fluently.Configure().ExposeConfiguration(x => cfg =
> x);
> PlayWithCfgHere
> var sf = fconfig.BuildSessionFactory();
>
>
> Or simple call ExposeConfi
Configuration cfg;
var fconfig=Fluently.Configure().ExposeConfiguration(x => cfg =
x);
PlayWithCfgHere
var sf = fconfig.BuildSessionFactory();
Or simple call ExposeConfiguration(Action) to modify/dowhatever
using a delegate.
Tuna Toksöz
http://tuna
I just want to get the Configuration object from Fluently.Configure().
Or can I pass a Configuration object to Fluently.Configure() ?
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Tuna Toksoz wrote:
> Fluently.Configure()
> .Database(/* your database settings */)
> .Mappings(/* your mappings */)
1. Fluently.Configure()
2. .Database(/* your database settings */)
3. .Mappings(/* your mappings */)
4. .ExposeConfiguration(/* alter Configuration */) // optional
5. .BuildSessionFactory();
says the post on James blog?
Tuna Toksöz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://turkiyealt.ne
13 matches
Mail list logo
