Hi Gleb, can you please explain what are you trying to achieve?
2014-03-25 8:52 GMT+13:00 Gleb Chermennov :
> Ok, I did try out to use SQLite for running NHibernate tests and I failed.
> But I still managed to install SQLite NuGet package properly, which I guess
> I can put on my CV as a separat
Ok, I did try out to use SQLite for running NHibernate tests and I failed.
But I still managed to install SQLite NuGet package properly, which I guess
I can put on my CV as a separate line lol.
Turns out, NHibernate doesn't have a sql script for setting up a database
before tests for SQLite (or
I'll try to do it some time next week and ask questions when they appear
(and they will, probably).
четверг, 6 марта 2014 г., 20:56:25 UTC+4 пользователь Jeff Doolittle
написал:
>
> I'd be willing to help out with getting tests running against SQLite or
> SqlCE. Let me know what you had in min
I'd be willing to help out with getting tests running against SQLite or
SqlCE. Let me know what you had in mind and if there are any other issues
to address to prepare for NH 4.0.
--Jeff
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:09:13 AM UTC-8, Gleb Chermennov wrote:
>
> Hello.
> I try to maintain the pro
Hello.
I try to maintain the project in my spare time - pull requests kindly
appreciated, as always :)
I'm aware that NHibernate is slowly arriving at 4.0 version, in fact
there's a branch named nh-net40-migration that checks compatibility with
NHibernate master branch. I haven't updated it in a
I'm a strong advocate for automapping, but barely any of the code in the
automapping section is mine. In reality, my involvement with the project has
always been minor. Do not be concerned by my absence :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent
Don't worry, no slighting received. :)
My point was, for the most part everyone involved knows how most things
work. There really aren't any specialists in our little team.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this g
James,
Thanks for the clarification.
I didn't mean to slight your efforts WRT to automapping, I'm just not
that familiar with the history of the project.
-Tom
On May 3, 4:31 am, James Gregory wrote:
> Automapping will continue. I don't believe Paul has been any more or less
> responsible for A
Automapping will continue. I don't believe Paul has been any more or less
responsible for Automapping than I have, in fact it was Andrew Stewart who
was the original Automapping guy and he hasn't been active in quite a while.
Nothing is dead, nothing is changing.
--
You received this message b
Is Automapping going to continue to the evolve with the rest of FNH?
I ask, because it's my understanding that Paul Batum has done most of
the work on this, and I just saw a recent posting where he said he's
not contributing to the project as much these days.
Not trying to knock Paul, or James, o
Thank you very much for your information. I'm glad that such a good
project get further development. Keep doing this good work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegro
Like I said, FNH is not dead. There's no "more or less" about it, there will
be a NH3.2 compatible release when it's done. Simple as that. No need to
worry.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email
Sorry, but my intention was not working NOW with a non-GA release. My
intention is to get know if this project will be exists for further NH
GA Releases or not!!! Not more or less! I like FNH and I like it how
easy it makes my life working with NH. Keep this!
--
You received this message because
For the record, it seems the latest fnh works with latest nh preview. The
only thing i had to change was proxy factory factory to the built one
On 01/05/2011 6:47 PM, "James Gregory" wrote:
> How very sensationalist a title this is.
>
> No, FNH is not dead. Yes, there will be a release for NH 3.2.
How very sensationalist a title this is.
No, FNH is not dead. Yes, there will be a release for NH 3.2.
As has always been the case, we don't track non-GA releases, so as NH 3.2 is
currently still in Alpha we don't have a release out for it.
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
The good news is that we did account for the possibility of moving away from
XML when we rewrote the internals of FNH, and so the change to use the new
mapping APIs is not actually that bad. It uses the visitor pattern to walk
the mapping structure and generate XML - someone just needs to write ano
Actually NH 3.2 is going to have Automapping features:
http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2011/04/nhibernate-32-mapping-by-code_13.html
Not sure whether in this article or another, Fabio mentioned he still sees
room for his own confORM library to make even stronger conventions
(automappings). If this
The only reason I would like to use NH 3.2 is the new Batcher. Not
more or less. I hope that the FNH will not die. It's better than any
other Mapping for NHibernate, which I saw.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to th
NH 2.3 does not support auto-mapping so I'll stick with fluent NH!
More info:
http://lostechies.com/jamesgregory/2011/04/13/me-on-nhibernate-3-2/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nh
19 matches
Mail list logo
