[fluid-dev] 1.1.0 Schedule, Trac permissions, etc

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Green
To help make things a bit more organized I will set forth a plan for the 1.1.0 development cycle. This is not set in stone and is open for input. Development cycle will be 3 months, which means FluidSynth 1.1.0 will be released around July 12th. Feature freeze will occur 2 weeks before. June 28

Re: [fluid-dev] Re: The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
jimmy escrigué: It seems we are all looking forward to 2.0, while 1.0 is agreed as legacy code base. I don't know how far along the code refactoring (FS 2.0) is. Can we get a status update, or current functions available. What's missing compare to 1.0.9? I still haven't worked a lot on i

Re: [fluid-dev] JACK Sample Rate

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Green
Hello Esben, Yes indeed, its a problem. Its on the list for the next release. Ticket #6 if you want to track it: http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/ticket/6 Cheers! Josh On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 03:03 +0200, Esben Stien wrote: > Running fluidsynth-1.0.9, which is really nice, thanks;),

[fluid-dev] JACK Sample Rate

2009-04-14 Thread Esben Stien
Running fluidsynth-1.0.9, which is really nice, thanks;), but it reports: fluidsynth: warning: Jack sample rate mismatch, expect tuning issues (synth.sample-rate=44100, jackd=96000) I run with -r 96000 and it's fine, but why don't you just get the sample rate from JACK?;). -- Esben Stien is b

Re: [fluid-dev] Re: The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Green
Hello Jimmy, On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 15:56 -0700, jimmy wrote: > It seems we are all looking forward to 2.0, while 1.0 is agreed as legacy > code base. > > I don't know how far along the code refactoring (FS 2.0) is. Can we get a > status update, or current functions available. What's missing c

[fluid-dev] Re: The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread jimmy
It seems we are all looking forward to 2.0, while 1.0 is agreed as legacy code base. I don't know how far along the code refactoring (FS 2.0) is. Can we get a status update, or current functions available. What's missing compare to 1.0.9? It may be better if we put more efforts to work towar

Re: [fluid-dev] Introductions and interest in FluidSynth

2009-04-14 Thread Zachary Northrup
Hello everyone, My name is Zachary Northrup and I'm a 16 year old living in New York (the state, not the city). I've been programming for about 6-7 years in the areas of (listed chronologically): web development, VB, VB/C# .NET, C++, C, robotics/embedded systems, electronics (of all kinds), an

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Hi, About the future versions, I agree with keeping compatibility in 1.1, adding new functionality while avoiding breaking existing applications. But at the same time, keep the 2.0 door open for changes that require incompatible changes. When functions must be added or changed, it would be sens

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Green
Hello David, On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 18:06 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > > With all this big changes and new plans, I'm wondering where does lie > > the 2.0 branch? I could have done some work these holidays but I have > > the feeling that we're diverging and I prefer to wait for the water to >

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Green
Hello Bernat, On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 11:00 +0200, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote: > First, I sent this message but it didn't get to my mailbox and it seems > to be ignored by everyone so I guess it didn't reach your mailbox > neither, I think it's interesting: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/fl

[fluid-dev] Re: Timing revisited

2009-04-14 Thread jimmy
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 9:00 AM > . . . > Okay, I stand corrected. Judging from the design of the > audio drivers > and the player/sequencer, it seems like those parts were > designed for > live usage only (up to now). Whatever changes made, please do keep in mind, and test the live u

Re: [fluid-dev] Introductions and interest in FluidSynth

2009-04-14 Thread Antoine Schmitt
Hello all, rapid introduction: I'm 47 and living in Paris, France. I'm both a programming consultant (www.schmittmachine.com ) and an artist (www.gratin.org/as/), using programming as a main artistic material : things that act by themselves, programmed freedom, things like this... I starte

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread David Henningsson
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó skrev: > First, I sent this message but it didn't get to my mailbox and it seems > to be ignored by everyone so I guess it didn't reach your mailbox > neither, I think it's interesting: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2009-04/msg00044.html I got it, read it, an

Re: [fluid-dev] The 1.1.0 milestone

2009-04-14 Thread Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
Josh Green escrigué: Hello, Its been really nice reading the introductions.. There are no specific qualifications on this, so if anyone else feels inspired to introduce themselves, please do. I know there are several other people on this list who have been long time FluidSynth contributors and