On 09/15/2011 05:52 AM, Matt Giuca wrote:
Note: I'm not trying to suggest taking action here. I think we've kind
of reached a consensus that the LGPL will remain on FluidSynth and the
developers won't actively pursue violations, but that perhaps there
will be a warning on the website. I'm just
Would the following text be suitable to put on the wiki, and represent the
sort-of consensus:
=== iOS and the App Store ===
It is questionable whether iOS and the App Store can fulfil the
requirements of the LGPL. From a long thread on the fluid-dev mailinglist
[insert link to archive], it
On 09/14/2011 03:41 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2011, Graham Goode wrote:
I think my iPhone is going to be
jail broken very soon ;)
I don't have any iSomething yet, but I agree that if I get one some day, this
will be my first priority, as it simply enables you
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com wrote:
Would the following text be suitable to put on the wiki, and represent the
sort-of consensus:
=== iOS and the App Store ===
It is questionable whether iOS and the App Store can fulfil the
requirements of the LGPL. From
Hi all,
I've been following this complex debate, and everything eventually
became clear to me when Peter voiced his position.
So I agree to the following text, please put my name on the list as a
contributor to FluidSynth (mainly the sequencer).
Thank you
Le 15 sept. 11 à 18:04, Element
I've been following along as well. My contributions are extremely tiny and
very recent as compared to others, but I'm fine with the statement as
defined previously as well.
Just to inject my opinion... I write software because it's what I love
doing, and it's even better working on a very fine
