Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 25/04/2016 14:02, jean-jacques.ceresa wrote:
Hi,
May be this will help.
This link is a starting point of discussion.
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2015-04/msg9.html
1)It gives functionnal behaviour of synt.audio-channels settings.
2)audio.jack.multi is
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Maciej - filologia angielska wrote:
2. Today I noticed that the problem must be due to Raspberry Pi's
limitations in terms of its computing power.
Fluidsynth, it has to be said, is a bit of a CPU hog. Unfortunately, I
believe the only way to boost performance is by using
Hi Lorenzo,
> Thanks for the pointers. From what you write, therefore, it is not
> currently possible to route each midi channel to an independent audio
> output with jack. Right?
It is possible. Have you tried smth like:
fluidsynth -o audio.jack.multi=no -o synth.audio-channels=16 -o synth.audi
Hi Tom,
On 26/04/2016 17:03, Tom M. wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
Thanks for the pointers. From what you write, therefore, it is not
currently possible to route each midi channel to an independent audio
output with jack. Right?
It is possible. Have you tried smth like:
fluidsynth -o audio.jack.multi=n
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:25 AM, R.L. Horn wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Maciej - filologia angielska wrote:
>
> 2. Today I noticed that the problem must be due to Raspberry Pi's
>> limitations in terms of its computing power.
>>
>
> Fluidsynth, it has to be said, is a bit of a CPU hog.
> Indeed that's the behaviour I expect. Do I have to specify 16? I tested
> with lower numebrs (e.g. 4, 6)... Maybe that is the problem?
Well, one midi port can always address 16 channels, and to avoid tinkering
like "on which midi channel does instrument 5 has to play now so it will be
heard on
Just wanted to follow up with some info on FPU support for that system. It
sounds like the Raspberry Pi does have hardware FPU support. However, it
may be that FluidSynth has not been compiled with it. From the 2nd
stackexchange answer (
http://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/545/does-th
On 26/04/16 17:21, Tom M. wrote:
Indeed that's the behaviour I expect. Do I have to specify 16? I tested
with lower numebrs (e.g. 4, 6)... Maybe that is the problem?
Well, one midi port can always address 16 channels, and to avoid tinkering
like "on which midi channel does instrument 5 has to p
