Josh Green escrigué:
How did you arrive at the conclusion that we aren't getting on very
well? I'm really excited that you are interested in working on cleaning
up the FluidSynth API and modularizing it. From this correspondence I
realize that I have a bit more desire to overhaul things, than s
On 2009/03/02 21:20, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
wrote:
> His first message had some valid complains, and a false assumption
> deduced from the observation that the CLI program doesn't exit when
> a MIDI song has finished. I've tried to answer politely pointing to
> the mistake, being rewarded with so
Josh Green wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I didn't feel that Max's input was particularly arrogant or disdainful.
> It was some strong criticism but it seemed to be rather constructive as
> well. There are indeed many shortcomings of FluidSynth and the project
> hasn't really been all that active since I too
Hello,
I didn't feel that Max's input was particularly arrogant or disdainful.
It was some strong criticism but it seemed to be rather constructive as
well. There are indeed many shortcomings of FluidSynth and the project
hasn't really been all that active since I took over maintainership of
it.
Max Kellermann wrote:
> I have not insulted anybody, I have not attacked anybody personally.
> Which you did ("spitted some bullshit"). Let's keep this discussion
> on a technical level, don't yield to personal criticism.
OK. I have been harsh and rude with you. Sorry about that. Please accept my
Josh Green wrote:
> Hello Pedro,
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 22:55 +0100, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > Anyway, I would like to ask what do you think about a new stable release
> > 1.0.9 from trunk, soon. I really like all the new drivers, and also
> > interesting bugfixes. I would like to be abl
Hello Pedro,
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 22:55 +0100, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> Anyway, I would like to ask what do you think about a new stable release
> 1.0.9
> from trunk, soon. I really like all the new drivers, and also interesting
> bugfixes. I would like to be able to fix tickets #22 and
Hello Bernat,
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 01:46 +0100, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> I don't want to do a rewrite, I'd like to be conservative about changes
> except where absolutely necessary to reach the goals. I would even delay
> libInstPatch or any other library integration if that meant a lot
On 2009/03/01 16:36, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
wrote:
> He pointed to some valid issues (i.e. const char*), and also spitted some
> bullshit. Starting by the general tone of disdain of his message.
>
> For instance, it is true that some parts of the FluidSynth API are not well
> documented. And
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas escrigué:
> > Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> >> I've been thinking a bit on what I'd like to do for FS2.0 and would be
> >> interesting to do. My goal is having a better code base to work on
> >> building new features and improving performance
On Feb 28, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
Hi.
Sorry for the long wait but I'm a bit busy lately. This is how it's
gonna be since this is something I have to do on my spare time so
there will be ups and lows inevitably, but I'm firmly decide to get
there with your help.
Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas escrigué:
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
I've been thinking a bit on what I'd like to do for FS2.0 and would be
interesting to do. My goal is having a better code base to work on
building new features and improving performance and compatibility
without the problems we have
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sorry for the long wait but I'm a bit busy lately. This is how it's
> gonna be since this is something I have to do on my spare time so there
> will be ups and lows inevitably, but I'm firmly decide to get there with
> your help.
I can understand you. I am c
Hello,
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:20 +0100, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Sorry for the long wait but I'm a bit busy lately. This is how it's
> gonna be since this is something I have to do on my spare time so there
> will be ups and lows inevitably, but I'm firmly decide to get there w
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 18:24 +0100, Bernat Arlandis i Mañó wrote:
> The attached image I promised. :)
>
> Josh, I couldn't upload this image to the wiki, here:
> http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/wiki/newdesign
>
Did you get an error? Or did it just not give you the option to attach
it? I w
The attached image I promised. :)
Josh, I couldn't upload this image to the wiki, here:
http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/wiki/newdesign
--
Bernat Arlandis i Mañó
<>___
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/l
Hi.
Sorry for the long wait but I'm a bit busy lately. This is how it's
gonna be since this is something I have to do on my spare time so there
will be ups and lows inevitably, but I'm firmly decide to get there with
your help.
I've been thinking a bit on what I'd like to do for FS2.0 and wo
17 matches
Mail list logo
