On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm glad it's ok with you
It is not "ok with us". It is OK.
The statement was a small indication that
we do not say what we say in order to attack,
insult or put down.
> Since talking and writing aren't about communication
That is not wha
I'm glad it's ok with you that I'm not literate. Since talking and writing
aren't about communication I'd be curious to see what you think they are
about.
In a message dated 12/18/02 6:44:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I mis-typed. No one is talking in this forum
No, we are talking.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=638&ncid=762&e=2&u=/nm/20021218/en_nm/music_mccartney_dc
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I mis-typed. No one is talking in this forum
No, we are talking.
> we are writing,
We are definitely not writing.
Besides, you are not literate (and that's OK) (this is nit an attack).
> which I'm pretty sure is about words.
It isn't :)
I mis-typed. No one is talking in this forum we are writing, which I'm pretty
sure is about words. Talking is indeed much different. Both are about
communication.
Bleat ??? as in goat or sheep?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thank you so much for doing that...
Your malcolm (as she would say...) ¬ Right after we all
got the news here on the Fluxlist, Roger said something
about going outside and just looking up to the sky. I did
this and decided, too, to take a couple of pictures back
then
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to say I have no idea what any of you are talking about. Why isn't
> someone not talking to me or you or us? Is this some giant word event.
Bleat : knee-jerk assumption.
Talking is not about words.
There is no 'why'.
Why, why 'the
I have to say I have no idea what any of you are talking about. Why isn't
someone not talking to me or you or us? Is this some giant word event.
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> You do not have facts, you have opinions. Flawed ones.
No babycheeks. We speak facts. We don't 'have' them.
We do not have "opinions" nor are we flawed. Wea re accurate + precise.
Avoida ttempting to project your wishful projections onto us.
> >
>
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> It doesn't, nor does it have anything to do with self-important old farts
> sitting in a cubical and not eating for a few days.
Infantile meaningless sidestep.
Standard response: when confronted with itself "evades" into
random noise. And we do und
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, sean henry wrote:
> Personnaly,
Personnalllie, the world revolves around your personalitie.
> my assumption
Assumptions. Expectations. Lovely dictatorial behavior.
> has always been that anything posted to the list was
> addressed to everyone.
It isn't. Even this is
on 12/18/02 3:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> set clothes on fire, pee flame dance fast
"et": You the ton installed or or fire of dances equipped tones the I GIVE
fast Fleming that you did not give tones is and us there GIVEN you small
over
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
on 12/18/02 2:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no muscle aches, drink three moves fast, train ager
"et": of sense that one found, quickly saw the not dates muscles, drinks
three movements, you with the sanitary napkins gave the jolt me elasticity
train That we do
--
Anne D
on 12/18/02 3:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> peach mounds throw darts no muscles ache drinks more ream stranger
"et": One-or I you that I do not give it to you peach, or game it within
those that germinates on it or Not, unknown maize drunk muscles of found
from packing
-
on 12/18/02 2:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we far?
"et": we or this which it, eliminated That we have?
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
on 12/18/02 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> who's to say
"et": the must saying to you
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
on 12/18/02 2:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> floating in flooding cold body dry breath steaming
"et": You stations of a moving nature and to cook you cold breath I curtly
give myself the bodies which I give to flood
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
Oh, Kathy...methinks that she didn't take the red wig
with...
;)
--- Kathy Forer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very special. And her hair isn't red, at all. Just as
> good as it can't
> be right.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 05:51 PM, Rod Stasick
> wrote:
>
> > my fondness:
> >
>
FYI...
http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen8/index.html
I agree very much about what your idea of what an artist is but I dont get who you are replying to. Also how do you judge who is a twit and who isnt? Actually I guess the audience judges but no one really listens to the audience thats why there are art critics and censors. Art sucks when you start
hey are you still here? I would have thought you would be bored and disgusted with fluxlist by now
I like hats
wow-I cant keep up with you two!
a good question
and what is fluxus?
I say bring em on!
they'll get bored and leave soon enough
thats not a dig towards fluxlist
just what happens when people have too much agenda
a natural course- you get out of the way and they move on
I agree censorship is for litewaits
but can't because it was stuck together
thanks Carol
thank you so much for doing that- made me cry. I forwarded that to her girlfriends- I miss her very much. She actually brought that spam recipe to a party at my house one year- people who were very drunk ate it and the rest was left outside for the night where the raccoons finished it off
oh yes!
give him an A
peach mounds throw darts no muscles ache drinks more ream stranger
set clothes on fire, pee flame dance fast
I don't know if I mentally slow
thanks- I will send you a dollar and a flat version of my latest performance art piece. My address is: Madawg
P.O. Box 916
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
no muscle aches, drink three moves fast, train ager
who's to say
we far?
floating in flooding cold body dry breath steaming
ifuckinhatespacebars
---
http://sixdigit.swiki.net
_
Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus
H, dear Bertrand,
>Well, I had some very inocent emails that never arrived on the list (maybe
>were they too innocent?)
>
Mine were also innocent emils.
Well, maybe the suggestion of using the internet
as medium for electric ostracism
seems to be dangerous for owners.
>How are you since Genova? W
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> it's a statement of fact.
You do not have facts, you have opinions. Flawed ones.
>
> We_ are not kids playing grown ups.
And you say I am blind.
> We are not obviating MOTIVATIONS. This is not a speculation.
All you do is specul
Dear Tamas & Bertrand,
I think the same thing happened to me... Maybe it's more an internet thing rather than a censorship one... Or is it? In any case, I also would be interested in knowing who the Fluxlist "belongs" to. I thought Allen Bukoff started it. Is that right?
fabrice.
>From: "Bertra
I want more detail on that one...
Fabrice.
>From: "meryl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Famous
>Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:30:59 -0500
>
>timothy leary grabbed my ass at a pagan gathering. But, he was really,
>really old.
>
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tell us again Joseph, how performance art has to do
> with attempting to solicit in an infantile manner other humans sexual
> drives?
It doesn't, nor does it have anything to do with self-important old farts
sitting in a cubical and
Personnaly,
my assumption has always been that anything posted to the list was addressed to everyone.
I don't see why I should have to be the witness of anybody's fights or bickering over matters that do not concern me. sometimes, it's funny, but most of the time it just unnecessarily cogs up my
Maybe I'm the teenager on this list. I could never quite let go the whole bands, gigs and life style that goes with it. Really sad, now. Guess I'll just have another coffee and a cigarette and ponder.
>From: "bibiana padilla maltos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PR
josh
i still have this really interesting material about the completely forgotten
cuban fluxus artist Jose Luis de la Pena (by the way grand-son of Virgilio
Narcisso Diaz de la Pena). i would have to translate some parts from german,
though... how many pages do you need?
georg
sorry, ken, i HAVE
hmm, haven't been subscribed to this list since, er, 1997. back then, ken
friedman was writing about half the comments on (and off) this list (at
least). is he on a holiday or has he turned his back on this institution?
georg
--
Georg Birkner Dipl. Arch. ETH
Roentgenstrasse 44
CH - 8005 Zürich
fo
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Bertrand Clavez wrote:
> Laughs
> (from a tape played backstage)
A fine example of wishful thinking ;)
Laughs
(from a tape played backstage)
> applause.
> (from the sidelines of course)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:48 PM
> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
>
>
Dear Eric,
Great new.
> and Fluxfilms, long version. I will see you in Paris in January
> sometimes
> around the 23rd.
> But I guess all this belongs off list.
You're right.
Best
Bertrand
MUSIC OF A CD PLAYER CONDUCTOR No. 1 (MP3 file)
http://stage.vitaminic.com/main/walter_cianciusi
Walter Cianciusi
51 matches
Mail list logo
