Thanks so much for going into this in patient detail.
I needed that.
j.

--- Rod Stasick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sure, no prob. These thing are sometimes easier to
> present in person.
> Remember these are the two kinds:
> 
> • 50 percent mesostics: between any two mesoletters,
> you can't have  
> the second
> 
> and
> 
> • 100 percent mesostics: between any two
> mesoletters, you can't have  
> either.
> 
> 
> 
> Let's use "The Gettysburg Address" as the source
> text and LINCOLN as  
> the spine:
> 
> > 
> Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought
> forth on this  
> continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and
> dedicated to the  
> proposition that all men are created equal.
> 
> Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing
> whether that nation  
> or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long
> endure. We are  
> met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come
> to dedicate a  
> portion of that field as a final resting-place for
> those who here  
> gave their lives that that nation might live. It is
> altogether  
> fitting and proper that we should do this. But in a
> larger sense, we  
> cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot
> hallow this ground.  
> The brave men, living and dead who struggled here
> have consecrated it  
> far above our poor power to add or detract. The
> world will little  
> note nor long remember what we say here, but it can
> never forget what  
> they did here.
> 
> It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here
> to the unfinished  
> work which they who fought here have thus far so
> nobly advanced. It  
> is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great
> task remaining  
> before us--that from these honored dead we take
> increased devotion to  
> that cause for which they gave the last full measure
> of devotion-- 
> that we here highly resolve that these dead shall
> not have died in  
> vain, that this nation under God shall have a new
> birth of freedom,  
> and that government of the people, by the people,
> for the people  
> shall not perish from the earth.
> 
> 
> 
> OK, so we start from the beginning of the text and
> look for a word  
> that has an "L" (our first mesoletter)
> 
> but no "I" because the next instance of an "I" will
> be the next  
> mesoletter. We find the word "aLl" - notice that we
> can't use  
> "liberty" because an "i" follows in the same word.
> OK, so we start  
> our mesostic with "aLl"
> 
> ...now, continuing in the text, we find the next
> word that has an  
> "I", remembering that our following letter "N"
> 
> will be in the next line...and so on...
> 
> As for the "wing words", you can have as many as you
> want as long as  
> they don't break the rules.
> 
> Wing words on the right of your spine can't have the
> FOLLOWING  
> mesoletter included anywhere in it's phrase
> 
> and wing words on the left of the spine cannot have
> the PREVIOUS  
> mesoletter included anywhere in it's phrase.
> 
> 
> 
> So, let's do "LINCOLN" just once and only use one
> word for each line  
> (no wing words - we can add those later),
> 
> we get (if I can line the letters up - MUCH easier
> on paper!):
> 
> 
> 
>                       aLl
> 
>                       cIvil
> 
>                   testiNg
> 
>                    dediCated
> 
>                       lOng
> 
>                    battLefield
> 
>                  portioN
> 
> 
> 
> By the way, when you come to the last letter in your
> spine,
> 
> you act as if you are going to start your spine word
> over.
> 
> In other words, for "LINCOLN" when you come to the
> last letter - "N" -
> 
> you are searching for a word that has an "N", that
> is not followed by  
> a "L" (your first letter in "LINCOLN").
> 
> 
> 
> OK, so let's add some "wing words". There are some
> exceptions in a  
> few of his works, but, generally, John made no rules
> about length of  
> the wing words. You can have none...or you can have
> lots...as long as  
> it doesn't break the mesostic rule that we've been
> speaking of -  
> repeated letters before the mesoletters. Wing words
> can be added to  
> make a particular point or create your own special
> slant on what is  
> or can be said. Punctuation can be implied by it's
> absence. For example:
> 
> 
> 
>                       aLl men are created
> 
>                       cIvil
> 
>                   testiNg whether that nation
> 
>                 so dediCated
> 
>                   can lOng endure
> 
>            a great battLefield
> 
>                a portioN of that
> 
> 
> 
>                     fieLd             [and so on...]
> 
> 
> 
> This is an example of choosing wing words that
> 
> allows you to convey, let's say, a patriotic
> meaning,
> 
> but, in another instance, you may be able to add
> just enough wing  
> words to
> 
> give some *other* implied meaning to the text.
> 
> 
> 
> and so it goes...
> 
> 
> Rod
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Now playing: Clarence Wheeler & The Enforcers -
> Right On

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to