I wish I was- dont you?
gee I AM sorry! who are you then?
thanks- if you send me your snail mail I will send you a fluxus peice I did in memory of Princess Petal--- madawg
death what is it that you want?
sorry you are not feeling well --its that time of year
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> I propose that you are not a MALE YANG LEADER.
You cannot propose anything babycheeks.
You're simply mouthing off :)
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> If you want a date, why don't you just ask?
Dearest babycheeks, nobody is solicting you.
We don't have any interest in you at all.
> Course I would definitely say no...that is a rejection.
Oh is THAT how it is? You just won't let it go
until
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> Here is Yin and Yang used for fortune telling ...
>
> http://www.fortuneangel.com/5EBasic.htm
>
> Gives you shivers, doesn't it.
Standard trick: find humans who abuse concepts
and present that abuse as the real thing.
Yin and YANG ARE EVIL PROPAG
> We havent "expressed" any "us" for you to agree or disagree with,
> nor would we care if we did.
I propose that you are not a MALE YANG LEADER.
joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy
go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 64
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As for the ancient "outmoded worldview" homosexual gay magic
> is two-yang. It's absolutely not controllable at all.
> Hence Monsieur Hitler killed them off. We suppose it still worked
> in 1940s.
If you want a date, why don't you ju
Here is Yin and Yang used for fortune telling ...
http://www.fortuneangel.com/5EBasic.htm
Gives you shivers, doesn't it.
joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy
go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> > Due to being egotistical. Envious, Fraud. Jealous.
> > Simpleton.
>
> The last resort of the childish mind -
No babycheeks. We are not at all on any "last resorts".
Keep your wishful brain cut outs to yourself.
Nor are we reacting from any br
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> Silly billy -
No dearest we are not silly.
> A worldview is a perception of the world, not the world itself.
Only an infantile brain obsessed ape can POSSIBLY
condescend with this ignorant statement.
Thea bove is simply NONSENSE. DRIVEL.
> If
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco.
No, babycheeks they are not.
> It doesn't matter how you want to define them,
Yin and yanga re not defined. They simply are.
Nor do we "want". We lack desires of such sort.
Nor do we
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> THE ONLY MIND-CONTROL GAME IS THAT THERE IS NOTHING BUT WORLDVIEWS.
Silly billy - A worldview is a perception of the world, not the world itself.
If you lived in a brick room with no doors and a hole through which food
appeared daily an
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> An effective control technique
We are not attempting to control anyone babycheeks.
Avoid attempting to place non-existent intent in our actions.
Secondly, you're a CONTROLLED ape.
You don't know anything about control techniques :)
> is to pres
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Due to being egotistical. Envious, Fraud. Jealous.
> Simpleton.
The last resort of the childish mind - "you disagree with me because you are
jealous of me". You sound like Eryk.
Grow up.
joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance is
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> To comment upon the actions of another without UNDERSTANDING is ARROGANCE. No
No it isn't babycheeks.
You don't know what arrogance is at all.
You simply whore out words (like your wife:)
to shove your ego.
> matter how you may claim UNDERSTANDI
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ying and Yang are two clowns hanging out in a Bejiing disco. It doesn't matter
how you want to define them, or how they have been defined in the past. They
are proproganda for an ancient worldview...I reject them...perhaps I would be
inter
The ignorant ape bleated again furthermore posturing in self-importance:
> YANG MALE ENERGY - opinionated, stubborn, and single-minded
> YIN FEMALE ENGERGY - open, optimistic, collaborative, and imagitive
That is not what yang energy is, babycheeks.
Yin energy is not "open, optimistic, collab
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I am quite confident you're intelligent enough to discern
>at least that there is a grain of truth in the above.
An effective control technique is to present a position and imply a person is
not intelligent (or moral) enough to unde
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah so lovely. Passive-aggressive idiocy.
>
> You "forgive" something that you lack UNDERSTANDING of?
>
> This is not forgiveness babycheeks, it's arrogance.
To comment upon the actions of another without UNDERSTANDING is ARROGANCE. N
> Now on to why you DISLIKE us (and hence the murderous idiotisms).
>
> There are two forces functioning in the human : yin and yang.
> When a human is DISCERNING, NOT OPEN TO SUGGESTIBILITY, and
> CONSCIOUS, s/he acts from a great dose of YANG MALE ENERGY.
>
> That is why you "dislike"
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Josh Ronsen wrote:
> But your point is taken, Don, and I hereby forgive those people on Fluxlist who
>recently were not talking to me...
Ah so lovely. Passive-aggressive idiocy.
You "forgive" something that you lack UNDERSTANDING of?
This is not forgiveness babycheek
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> aggressive comments (I apologize if any were mine). Artistic environements
> should never be censored but respect should always be given.
Certainly. And that would apply to ignorants who won't take "NO"
as an answer, and attempt to "attach them
H,
In the IPUT-Archives there is a frying-pan
what Mr. Friedman personally used in 1988 in Geneva, Ch,
when he visited the Gallery Ruine.
He used the pan with his own hands to fry two eggs
(just after that he saw a blue sculpture of a naked woman).
The assistants of the Archives were told not to w
alas, no photo. why don't you post it so we can see it?
bests, carol
Josh Ronsen wrote:
> Carol Starr wrote:
>
> >josh i agree with you about ken friedman and still feel it is a
> >great loss that he left the list. i too have a collection of the
> >essays he posted on the list. so perhaps there
Don Boyd writes:
>Josh, How about an "old snail mail address?"
I was just kidding about working on Fluxus for Dummies book, but it would make a
welcome addition to the more absurd titles in that series, like "Judism for Dummies"
and "Doctorial Studies in High Energy Physics for Dummies." OK, th
Carol Starr wrote:
>josh i agree with you about ken friedman and still feel it is a
>great loss that he left the list. i too have a collection of the
>essays he posted on the list. so perhaps there are two limited >editions, i wonder if
>they are the same?
Mine has a little photo of him about
good evening slavko kacunko
i really hope that you've found this contact information for allan kaprow.
if so, i would highly appreciate if you sent it to me!
this summer, me and my girlfriend visited kaprow's
environment at mumok in vienna. there, we immediately fell in love with one
of the sofa
PROTECTED]
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FLUXLIST-digest)
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:49:57 -0800
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: FLUXLIST-digest V3 #350
>
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:51:02 -0600
> From: "Josh Ronsen" <[EMAIL PRO
on 12/20/02 5:12 PM, Josh Ronsen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So what does everyone on this list listen to?
DJ SCREW
+ some other things
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
good evening kate
rafael horzon (http://www.modocom.de) has nothing to do with fluxus but is
really very cool and is also in berlin. do not be afraid to visit him in his
shop at Torstraße 68, Berlin-Mitte - as far as i know, he is also likable,
although i don't know him personally...
georg
--
G
on 12/20/02 5:25 PM, Josh Ronsen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've always been attracted to the darker side of Fluxus history, the
> expulsions, arguments, excommunications
Have you read this?-
http://www.henryflynt.org/aesthetics/APchptr10.html
not really "dark side", but still a different lo
Don Boyd writes:
>The "Spirit" of Fluxus, as I understood it, what attracted me to it, was the
>expansiveness, the willingness to support others and their ideas, in fact
>forgiveness and inclusiveness. I don't see that in these recent exchanges.
I've always been attracted to the darker side of
>So what does everyone on this list listen to?
I am still very much interested in the modernist/avant-garde composers Ligeti,
Xenakis, Nono, Scelsi, Stockhausen, and Cage and Feldman whose works exist on another
level. Ligeti continually surprises me. I just listened to the recent Sony CD of his
I would agree with Don's statement about the spirit of Fluxus. I've enjoyed
this list for it's fun and inclusiveness. Everyone is supportive of peoples
requests and comments and there have recently been some wierd and I would say
aggressive comments (I apologize if any were mine). Artistic envir
to all on the FLUXLIST
very best wishes to everyone for whatever holiday you are or are not
celebrating at this time of the winter solstice. the almost full moon
last night was an unforgettable experience; 10 degrees and air so very
clear and sparkling snow. (my dog takes me out).
it has been a
The "Spirit" of Fluxus, as I understood it, what attracted me to it, was the
expansiveness, the willingness to support others and their ideas, in fact
forgiveness and inclusiveness. I don't see that in these recent exchanges.
-Don
josh i agree with you about ken friedman and still feel it is a great loss that he
left the list. i too have a collection of the essays he posted on the list. so perhaps
there are two limited editions, i wonder if they are the same?
bests, carol
Josh Ronsen wrote:
> Ken Friedman is an informa
> Maybe before the end
> of the year I will make a list of links to his essays for those who did not
> see them when first posted.
>
> -Josh Ronsen
> in Austin, Texas
thanks josh that would be of much help.
by the way i agree with you about ken friedman...
gabriel
Ken Friedman is an informative, helpful writer and a wonderful correspondant and I
feel honored to have been in contact with him. And even when I disagree with his
views, I do so with respect. The amount of informative substance on Fluxlist has
dramatically dropped since he left. I have collecte
At 01:43 PM 12/17/2002 +, you wrote:
on 12/17/02 4:45 PM, John M. Bennett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ate you the lung subjective case tow it spew the lung it spoons whip, nor
> glow of sputum hives stones, of wrist stones from glovement it ignores,
> fierce silence - new mulch you choking
At 02:12 PM 12/17/2002 +, you wrote:
on 12/17/02 4:55 PM, John M. Bennett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ate spit slabs releasing
"et": * It, that the fatty ground gold mould of the elasticity of the
tastes of fatty ground gold mould freely, yew of fatty ground the gold mould
of fatty ground
At 02:00 PM 12/17/2002 +, you wrote:
on 12/17/02 4:51 PM, John M. Bennett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ate mold tongue gives lonely slime i spore injectly thrown it from the
> slaw glove, it spurts glove the mildly slime recision it tongues like
> shaved hose mold grunted you slime spans tr
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> You confrontations, like spider webs in the face, dissolve under pressure. Spin
> your webs on the weak, little spiderman. A spider does not "speak"
Meaningless "symbolical" drivel.
Nothing of the sort is occurring babycheeks.
The "symbolism" th
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> > We do not have "opinions" nor are we flawed. Wea re accurate + precise.
>
> Like an anteater who claims to eat plants. "I am a vegatarian!"
Nothing like the wishful projections inside your brain, babycheeks.
We are_ accurate & precise. You are a
--- Josh Ronsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe someone should repost the very first Fluxlist post
> in celebration.
Well, in reality...it's the 10,000th post under the newest
archive system. The old archive system is all wicky-wacky,
so who knows?
here's the first (or, rather, the 0th) un
Rod Stasick writes:
>Crispin Webb leaves the 10,000th Fluxlist post!
Maybe someone should repost the very first Fluxlist post in celebration.
Rod, are you currently in Texas?
-Josh Ronsen
in Austin, Texas
Need a new email address that people can remember
Check out the new EudoraMail at
The usual nonsense. I have never harassed that man. Just explained how
he was seen by the Fluxus artists. We would all have preferred that he
had promoted something else.
Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Georg--
>
> ...Anderson starrted harrassing him on-list and he left. We miss him.
> AK
20
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FLUXLIST-digest)
>> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Datum: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:30:10 -0800
>> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Betreff: FLUXLIST-digest V3 #338
>>
>>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Dec
> OK, specifically who is not talking to me? I have lost track.
I'm not talking to anyone so I guess I'm not talking to you either. Some are
all mouth and trousers though.
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We do not have "opinions" nor are we flawed. Wea re accurate + precise.
Like an anteater who claims to eat plants. "I am a vegatarian!"
The ants still run.
joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy
go
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Infantile meaningless sidestep.
> Standard response: when confronted with itself "evades" into
> random noise. And we do understand, Joseph.
You confrontations, like spider webs in the face, dissolve under pressure. Spin
your webs on
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> You do not have facts, you have opinions. Flawed ones.
No babycheeks. We speak facts. We don't 'have' them.
We do not have "opinions" nor are we flawed. Wea re accurate + precise.
Avoida ttempting to project your wishful projections onto us.
> >
>
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> It doesn't, nor does it have anything to do with self-important old farts
> sitting in a cubical and not eating for a few days.
Infantile meaningless sidestep.
Standard response: when confronted with itself "evades" into
random noise. And we do und
on 12/18/02 2:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no muscle aches, drink three moves fast, train ager
"et": of sense that one found, quickly saw the not dates muscles, drinks
three movements, you with the sanitary napkins gave the jolt me elasticity
train That we do
--
Anne D
on 12/18/02 3:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> peach mounds throw darts no muscles ache drinks more ream stranger
"et": One-or I you that I do not give it to you peach, or game it within
those that germinates on it or Not, unknown maize drunk muscles of found
from packing
-
on 12/18/02 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> who's to say
"et": the must saying to you
--
Anne Drogyness (dnae)
I agree very much about what your idea of what an artist is but I dont get who you are replying to. Also how do you judge who is a twit and who isnt? Actually I guess the audience judges but no one really listens to the audience thats why there are art critics and censors. Art sucks when you start
hey are you still here? I would have thought you would be bored and disgusted with fluxlist by now
a good question
and what is fluxus?
I say bring em on!
they'll get bored and leave soon enough
thats not a dig towards fluxlist
just what happens when people have too much agenda
a natural course- you get out of the way and they move on
I agree censorship is for litewaits
but can't because it was stuck together
oh yes!
peach mounds throw darts no muscles ache drinks more ream stranger
I don't know if I mentally slow
thanks- I will send you a dollar and a flat version of my latest performance art piece. My address is: Madawg
P.O. Box 916
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
no muscle aches, drink three moves fast, train ager
who's to say
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> it's a statement of fact.
You do not have facts, you have opinions. Flawed ones.
>
> We_ are not kids playing grown ups.
And you say I am blind.
> We are not obviating MOTIVATIONS. This is not a speculation.
All you do is specul
t?
fabrice.
>From: "Bertrand Clavez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
>Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:43:38 +0100
>
>Dear Tamas,
>Well, I had some very ino
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tell us again Joseph, how performance art has to do
> with attempting to solicit in an infantile manner other humans sexual
> drives?
It doesn't, nor does it have anything to do with self-important old farts
sitting in a cubical and
12:46:11 -0800
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: FLUXLIST-digest V3 #341
>
> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:05:03 -0600
> From: "Josh Ronsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: FLUXLIST: Re: easy reading materials
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> dont
ec 2002 11:58:57 +0100
> From: Eric Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
>
> Dear Bertrand,
>
> I have never attacked Ken Friedman's person on this list or off the
> list.
> Only explained how he was seen by Fluxus artists.
>
> Eric
>
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Bertrand Clavez wrote:
> Laughs
> (from a tape played backstage)
A fine example of wishful thinking ;)
Laughs
(from a tape played backstage)
> applause.
> (from the sidelines of course)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:48 PM
> Subject:
Dear Eric,
Great new.
> and Fluxfilms, long version. I will see you in Paris in January
> sometimes
> around the 23rd.
> But I guess all this belongs off list.
You're right.
Best
Bertrand
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> Your penis is erect even as we speak.
Ah. There it goes. Cheap attempt at attack on sexuality.
> I have nothing to hide here.
Absolutely correct. You're an empty bloated egotist.
> > We simply LOOK at you (and there ir's written. ON YOU).
>
> Yo
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> > Actually WE DO.
>
> No matter how much you proclaim it, YOU DO NOT.
We do not 'proclaim' anything dearest.
it's a statement of fact.
> You are mimicing what I write.
No dearest. We are not mimicking anything of yours.
The whole of your post
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We are not even attempting to engage in such acts.
> Keep your pornographic fantasies to yourself.
Your penis is erect even as we speak.
> No babycheeks. You're NOT amused.
> Your "posturing" "amusedly" to cover up your arse :)
I h
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually WE DO.
No matter how much you proclaim it, YOU DO NOT.
> It's quitea pparent by how you try to mimic what we write
> as if you'd somehow 'assume' the 'authority'
> and 'meaning' of what we write.
You are mimicing what I w
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> You have not even penetrated the first layer of clothing.
We are not even attempting to engage in such acts.
Keep your pornographic fantasies to yourself.
We REFLECT you as YOU ARE.
> But it is amusing to
No babycheeks. You're NOT amused.
Yo
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> such matter as you are an idiotic egotistic catatonic
> simpleton who is pissy to be revealeda s what you_ are.
You have not even penetrated the first layer of clothing. But it is amusing to
see that you are keeping a database of delus
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, matt benson wrote:
> hmm...should have expected some sort of snide conceptual remark to come
> floating back.
Bleat. Babycheeks. We 'sent' you no 'conceptual remarks'.
We don't 'concept'. Your "expectations" are simply
a brain knee-jerk + blindness on your part.
How
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
Oh look, the ape now mimicries.
> We were not speaking to you.
You joseph are not a 'we'. Nor are you capable of speaking TO anyone :)
> However, I will respond. You have no ability to
> HOLD RESPONSIBLE anyone for their actions.
Actually WE DO.
No
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> Something you have proven incapable of doing.
We have "proven" nothing of the sort babycheeks.
Keep your myopic wishful projections to yourself.
Additionally, you are NOT capable of judging or perceiving
such matter as you are an idiotic egotisti
applause.
(from the sidelines of course)
- Original Message -
From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
> On Tue, 17 Dec 20
hmm...should have expected some sort of snide conceptual remark to come
floating back. and who cares if i comment from the sidelines instead of
getting overly emotionally involved and defensive.
and this IS entertaining, though in no way relating to the likes of
mind-numbing television and laugh t
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> to such, and namely the idea of ARTISTIC REVOLT
> against the mistreatment of humans.
Something you have proven incapable of doing.
joseph (cor e form art) + (porat per ance ist)
frank + lyn - mc + El + roy
go shopping -> http://www.
it's very complicated...
> OK, specifically who is not talking to me? I have lost track.
>
> -Josh Ronsen
> in Austin, Texas
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We were not speaking to you. However, I will respond. You have no ability to
HOLD RESPONSIBLE anyone for their actions. And regardless of how many capital
letters you use, you do not exert authority over anybody. You are an impotent
entity
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> just thot I would direct the energy to ideas rather than individuals-
The very adorable fascists enjoyed that tactic very much.
"Directing" human energies towards "nebulous "lofty" "ideas".
Note that we are not implying that you are or labeling
> Bests
> Bertrand
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:58 AM
> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
>
> > Dear Bertrand,
&
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> only when rebel teens hook in- usually well.
The only "rebel teen" here babycheeks is you.
> I shall speak for myselfI
> pipe in when there is talk of Yoko and burning museums
Burning museums? And churches?
Rebel teens?
AHEM.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think you are a teenager: to mispercieve and then berate
You cannot think, love.
The only teenager here is you : keep your wishful projections
to yourself.
The only one 'misperceiving'--and down right incapable of perception
here is 'you'
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> actually it was very conscious-
No babycheeks. You are not conscious.
Premeditated? "calculatory" asleep kneejerk of your brain?
Sure. Conscious? Not.
> are you a teenager?
Are you a teenager love?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote:
> What? Do you go around smashing people's faces also?
The only one smashing people's faces here is you dear.
Making your incogruous pretentious imbecilities OBVIOUS
which is what WE DO is not 'smashing your face'.
Why don't you entertain us again
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, John M. Bennett wrote:
> It was entertaining for a while.
We are not here to 'entertain' you. We have never been 'entertaining'.
> Now I'd prefer they both shut up
But of course you would PREFER that others act like
"you" want them to, wouldn't "you"?
> unless
> they
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bertrand Clavez wrote:
> Shit happens sometimes.
No dearest. Humans attempting to damage others is not 'shit happens'.
Humans attempting to appropriate another's capacity for autonomous,
individual, conscious, volitional ACTION (an aspect of which is
ARTISTIC CREATIVI
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, matt benson wrote:
> does this banter happen often?
The only 'banter' here is yours, dear :)
> (i don't want to get involved.
No you just want to comment from the sideline without consequences.
Bleat said the voyeristic (inactive) (passiive-aggressive) idiot.
I juzt
701 - 800 of 1839 matches
Mail list logo
