Re: FLUXLIST: Sound Thanks

2001-02-16 Thread Sol Nte
Hi Rod, Of course, I now have to get out the "MP3 for Dummies" to find out why 45 seconds of sound would take up 1.4 MG - maybe because of 256kbps/44 Hz?) The higher the bitrate (i.e. 256kbps) the better the sound quality and the bigger the file. You can get 2 minutes of music into less than

Re: FLUXLIST: Sound Thanks

2001-02-16 Thread Rod Stasick
•^¦sol: yes, thanks! at 16kbps it only takes up 90kb for 45 sec., but it sounds like doo-doo on a ny street. at 32kbps (180kb), it's sound quality improves to more like doo-doo on a stick. to the rest of you: this FreeRip thing is the cat's meow (he says in his naivete). listen to sol. it's

Re: FLUXLIST: Sound Thanks

2001-02-16 Thread Heiko Recktenwald
although I remember Heiko mentioning that his encoder would do 8), however Yeah. Telephone quality.. Check http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs106/stanfor4.mp3 , around 20 minutes, around 1 MB... I think 128 kbits/sec is what people call CD quality

FLUXLIST: Sound Thanks

2001-02-15 Thread Roger Stevens
I think we've solved the mpg rpm problem thanks to all who replied and especially Sol who (I hope) has provided the answer BIG THANK YOU How Do You Do by Ivor Cutler A man was thirsty. He ran after a camel. The camel stopped till he caught up.The man did not know what to do.

Re: FLUXLIST: Sound Thanks

2001-02-15 Thread Rod Stasick
Yes, Sol! Thanks for that bit of info. I downloaded that utility and now I'm no longer an MP3 virgin. (Of course, I now have to get out the "MP3 for Dummies" to find out why 45 seconds of sound would take up 1.4 MG - maybe because of 256kbps/44 Hz?) Thanks again, Rod (not eating Ivor Cutler's