On 3/18/2012 6:54 PM, Martin Baldan wrote:
BGB, please see my answer to shaun. In short:
_ I'm not looking for stack-based languages. I want a Lisp which got
rid of (most of the) the parens by using fixed arity and types,
without any loss of genericity, homoiconicity or other desirable
On 3/19/2012 5:24 AM, Martin Baldan wrote:
but, hmm... one could always have 2 stacks: create a stack over the stack,
in turn reversing the RPN into PN, and also gets some meta going on...
Uh, I'm afraid one stack is one too many for me. But then again, I'm
not sure I get what you mean.
in
You could try VHDL, it's particularly suited to time/event driven
state changes, and you can make assertions in complementary languages
if need be.
Regards,
Alexis
On 19 March 2012 20:10, Benoît Fleury benoit.fle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any language out there that
Hi Benoit
This is basically what publish and subscribe schemes are all about. Linda is
a simple coordination protocol for organizing such loose couplings. There are
sketches of such mechanisms in most of the STEPS reports
Spreadsheets are simple versions of this
The Playground language
Maybe not what you are looking for, but you might find
http://awelon.org/ interesting.
BR,
John
2012/3/19 Benoît Fleury benoit.fle...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any language out there that lets you describe
the behavior of an object as a grammar.
An object would receive a
Hi All--
Just wanted to say that there is some cross-over here to electronic bus
systems, and the related Producer-Consumer paradigm (PC). Some bus systems
broadcast all messages to all connected nodes, ie they are unaddressed. In
particular Bosch's CAN bus, used in cars, trucks, industry, and
Better off looking at my blog.
http://awelonblue.wordpress.com
I'm still working on a concept of generative grammars for stable
pseudo-state. It's described in a few of my blog articles, including the
most recent ones.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:52 PM, John Nilsson j...@milsson.nu wrote:
Maybe
Here's the real naive question...
I'm fuzzy about why objects should receive messages but not send them. I think
I can see the mechanics of how it might work, I just don't grok why it's
important.
What motivates? Are we trying to eliminate the overhead of ST-style message
passing? Is
Hi Casey,
the decoupling of the event emitters and receivers is what I find the most
interesting in a pub/sub model. The publisher raises an event (in its
semantic domain) and does not know what subscribers are going to receive it
or what they're going to do with it. One of the advantage of this
Various motivations include looser coupling, extensibility,
resilience. Also, pub/sub allows modeling frameworks as regular objects.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Casey Ransberger
casey.obrie...@gmail.comwrote:
Here's the real naive question...
I'm fuzzy about why objects should receive
10 matches
Mail list logo
