Am 04.10.2013 13:04, schrieb Loup Vaillant-David:
> As for augmenting the human intellect, I hope we will see improvements
> over the current peer-review-then-publish model of doing science. (An
> obvious idea would be continuous crowd review, which would mark papers
> as they become obsolete, inv
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 04:15:12PM -0700, James McCartney wrote:
> Because ARPA probably would have rejected funding for a worldwide system
> for the interchange of kitty pictures and porn.
That's only the first step. According to Benjamin Bayart, "CEO" of
the non-profit ISP "French Data Network"
I've been lurking on this list for 6 years just to post this.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
> At Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:15:12 -0700,
> James McCartney wrote:
> >
> > In the early 60s JCR Licklider, a psychologist at the Advanced Research
> > Projects Agency put forth a great
At Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:15:12 -0700,
James McCartney wrote:
>
> In the early 60s JCR Licklider, a psychologist at the Advanced Research
> Projects Agency put forth a great vision: “It is the destiny of computers
> to become interactive intellectual amplifiers for all people pervasively
> networked w
In the early 60s JCR Licklider, a psychologist at the Advanced Research
Projects Agency put forth a great vision: “It is the destiny of computers
to become interactive intellectual amplifiers for all people pervasively
networked worldwide”.
Because ARPA probably would have rejected funding for a w
http://www.vpri.org/pdf/hc_what_Is_a_dynabook.pdf
-- Yoshiki
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
