Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 6:50 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you actually read the NSF proposal and its secondary literature?
I read everything that didn't smell like "implementation", but I think
I didn't really understand it.
I had the impressio
Hi,
On Nov 26, 2007 3:13 AM, Steven H. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the VPRI teaching goals are only indirectly related to the FONC
> project. The latter seems to be a reexamination of the programming
> process with the goal of developing a unified programming model that
> works fo
Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 26, 2007 3:13 AM, Steven H. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the VPRI teaching goals are only indirectly related to the FONC
project. The latter seems to be a reexamination of the programming
process with the goal of developing a unified program
On Nov 26, 2007 2:32 PM, Steven H. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The VPRI goals are certainly open ended and will need to gain focus to
> show useful results, but just as lack of focus can dilute efforts, too
> much focus too early in a research project can channel the work into
> non-product
Hi,
thanks for taking the time to reply. I'm moving this discussion out of
the original thread and I'll split my reply into two parts, so the
original thread can stay clean.
On Nov 24, 2007 11:12 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As far as I understand the goals for the language a
> What will "the system" be? Just a language generator?
"The system" I have in my mind is basically what is described in:
http://www.vpri.org/pdf/NSF_prop_RN-2006-002.pdf
--
... a practical working system that is also its own model; a whole
system from the end-users to the metal that could
On Nov 25, 2007 7:14 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> ... a practical working system that is also its own model; a whole
> system from the end-users to the metal that could be extremely compact
> (we think under 20,000 lines of code) yet practical enough to serve
> both as
On Nov 25, 2007, at 14:49 , Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 7:14 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
... a practical working system that is also its own model; a whole
system from the end-users to the metal that could be extremely
compact
(we think under 20,000 l
Bitten again. :(
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jason Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 25, 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [fonc] goal clarifications (was: goals)
To: Waldemar Kornewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Nov 25, 2007 2:49 PM, Waldemar Kornewald <[EMAIL PR
On Nov 25, 2007 6:50 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you actually read the NSF proposal and its secondary literature?
I read everything that didn't smell like "implementation", but I think
I didn't really understand it.
I had the impression that, put very bluntly, it's about
10 matches
Mail list logo
