On 1 June 2010 12:57, Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk wrote:
Are we going to start using google as a foundry name, or take the
original source of these, where possible?
Google is the foundry for a couple of em, but most of em have their
own homepages which ought to be treated as upstream
On 18 July 2010 06:49, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
the openfontlibrary.org site
will return to normal operations in some time AFAIK.
Yes, I'm one of the primary devs and it will return :)
___
fonts mailing list
On 22 June 2010 15:36, Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk wrote:
Or alternatively, would it be OK to package the TLOMT fonts with OTFs in
their zips without going from source?
I suggest that packagers contact the font developer and ask them to
generate UFO sources that are equivalent to the
Hi,
Where can I find a Fedora font SRPM with a makefile, from which I can
make one for Cantarell? :-)
I suppose this will be a FontForge Python script; if there isn't yet
one, I will make one.
Cheers
Dave
___
fonts mailing list
On 16 August 2010 09:44, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 11:10 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
FYI
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/08/12/30-new-free-high-quality-fonts-typography/
Thanks! Its so sad more than the half of them are
On 22 March 2011 11:20, Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk wrote:
I think that means we should update FontForge in F15 and invite people to
rebuild, in the knowledge that it'll all just work?
SGTM :)
___
fonts mailing list
Hi!
There is no easy answer - vertical metrics are always tradeoffs, and
since your font supports Vietnamese diacritics which are very tall -
see attached viet.png - then the vertical metrics around the 'plain'
Latin glyphs - see attached latin.png - are seemingly too tall.
But if you adjust the
On 24 March 2012 12:52, Corey Richardson co...@octayn.net wrote:
3. Are the fonts listed on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist
purely in want of a packeger (i.e. I can get cracking)?
This is a job I've also been neglecting for a long time :-)
I'm not sure if that list is
On 25 March 2012 12:50, Corey Richardson co...@octayn.net wrote:
You're thinking point the script at a font
and out comes a spec file/SRPM?
I have a feeling that with sfntly, ttx or fontforge-python it would be
possible to automate much of the process, using Zenity for the rest :)
On 14 May 2012 21:50, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose no reply mean everyone is happy with Liberation fonts as
a default install package.
I will ask the Google team who manage the croscore fonts (which are
commissioned from Monotype) about getting better public points of
Hi!
The following is all my own personal opinion; I currently do some font
related consulting for Google Inc (mainly Web Fonts project) so I know
a little bit about these fonts, but this is NOT an official position
of the company in any way.
On 15 July 2012 21:42, Nicolas Mailhot
Remember to change the name of any OFL fonts with RFNs if you do :)
___
fonts mailing list
fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Hmm, Lato hasn't changed its status since it was launched, as far as I know.
___
fonts mailing list
fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Hi Richard and Tom!
On 6 December 2012 05:53, Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com wrote:
In response to a well-articulated request by a developer, Red Hat is
hereby dual-licensing Overpass Fonts[1] under the SIL Open Font
License 1.1 (heretofore the license of the fonts) and the Apache
On 27 December 2012 08:57, Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com wrote:
2. Added Trademark line in COPYRIGHT file
I am very confused - this contradicts the idea of dropping of the RFN.
___
fonts mailing list
fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 27 December 2012 15:23, Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:04:12AM +, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 27 December 2012 08:57, Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com wrote:
2. Added Trademark line in COPYRIGHT file
I am very confused - this contradicts the idea
I guess that approach will work, but since the web fonts will be in a
variety of non-system formats (WOFF, EOT, SVG) and may be subset/etc
for the web, I'm not sure it makes sense to package them for the
system. It might make more sense to package them as regular static web
assets specific to the
Great project! Will you use FEA files to write the table logic?
___
fonts mailing list
fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
On 27 January 2014 05:39, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
now that we have the croscore fonts available in Debian, too, I really
wonder what we need liberation v2 fonts for? I mean, are they anything
more than a rebranded version of the croscore fonts?
croscore fonts are rebranded
I agree, packaging families within a superfamily individually sounds
better to me
On 17 November 2014 11:24, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2014 15:11, Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:52
I'm the Noto product owner at Google Fonts, I expect the wider range of
styles available by itself would make Noto fonts a better choice :) I would
be happy to hear any aspects of Lohit that are superior
___
fonts mailing list --
Noto fonts are available with sources and fully libre CI build systems at
GitHub.com/notofonts and follow open source development methodology,
although they use the format preferred by the font designer. Some use sfd,
one even uses their own custom font code in python, but - as in the
majority of
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023, 4:51 PM pravin@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 02:39, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> I'm the Noto product owner at Google Fonts, I expect the wider range of
>> styles available by itself would make Noto fonts a better choice :) I would
23 matches
Mail list logo
