[Bug 476459] move 66-vlgothic-gothic.conf to 65-1-vlgothic-gothic.conf

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 492510] wqy-bitmap-fonts needs lang fontconfig

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-25 21:55:05 EST --- wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.9.9-12.fc13 has been submitted as an u

rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-13 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf, 1.6, 1.7 wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec, 1.24, 1.25

2010-02-25 Thread Qianqian Fang
Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/F-13 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13892 Modified Files: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: remove all preferences from 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf, will rely on 65-nonlatin in the future

rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.24,1.25

2010-02-25 Thread Qianqian Fang
Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13369 Modified Files: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec Log Message: update changelog in the spec file Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec ===

rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf,1.6,1.7

2010-02-25 Thread Qianqian Fang
Author: fangq Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12916 Modified Files: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf Log Message: remove all preference settings, will rely on 65-nonlatin to set the preference Index: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf

[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 --- Comment #20 from Matthew Miller 2010-02-25 15:50:11 EST --- Sorry for the late-night ran. Not meaning to be anti-constructi

[Bug 567643] SIGSEGV inside Pango in gtk_label_size_request with large multiline string running downloaded copy of OpenXenCenter

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567643 Bruce W. Tucker changed: What|Removed |Added ---

rpms/smc-fonts/F-13 smc-fonts.spec,1.15,1.16

2010-02-25 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/F-13 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12414 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: updated base package license Index: smc-fonts.spec === RCS fil

rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.15,1.16

2010-02-25 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12315 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: updated base package license Index: smc-fonts.spec === RCS fi

[Bug 568229] [ml_IN] License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 568229] [ml_IN] License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-02-25 10:03:00 EST --- smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for

rpms/smc-fonts/devel AnjaliOldLipi-license-confirmation-email.txt, NONE, 1.1 66-smc-meera.conf, 1.3, 1.4 67-smc-anjalioldlipi.conf, 1.1, 1.2 67-smc-dyuthi.conf, 1.1, 1.2 67-smc-kalyani.conf, 1.1, 1.2

2010-02-25 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2788 Modified Files: 66-smc-meera.conf 67-smc-anjalioldlipi.conf 67-smc-dyuthi.conf 67-smc-kalyani.conf 67-smc-rachana.conf 67-smc-raghumalayalam.conf 67-smc-sur

rpms/smc-fonts/F-13 AnjaliOldLipi-license-confirmation-email.txt, NONE, 1.1 66-smc-meera.conf, 1.3, 1.4 67-smc-anjalioldlipi.conf, 1.1, 1.2 67-smc-dyuthi.conf, 1.1, 1.2 67-smc-kalyani.conf, 1.1, 1.2 6

2010-02-25 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/F-13 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1891 Modified Files: 66-smc-meera.conf 67-smc-anjalioldlipi.conf 67-smc-dyuthi.conf 67-smc-kalyani.conf 67-smc-rachana.conf 67-smc-raghumalayalam.conf 67-smc-suru

[Bug 567612] No fontconfig config files provided

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567612 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 563409] fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 568229] [ml_IN] License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2010-02-25 05:19:43 EST --- thats look good i will do that -- Configure bugmail: https://b

[Bug 568229] [ml_IN] License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2010-02-25 04:22:34 EST --- When the legal documentation bundled with a font says X, and up