[Bug 621445] .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non-latin TSCu_Paranar

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621445 --- Comment #3 from K. Sethu 2010-08-05 02:34:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > 1) The cur

[Bug 614373] freetype-2.4.1 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614373 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 621445] .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non-latin TSCu_Paranar

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621445 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 578039] lang-specific overrides rule doesn't work as expected

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578039 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2010-08-05 00:25:54 EDT --- reported a new bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6

[Bug 621445] .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non-latin TSCu_Paranar

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621445 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2010-08-05 00:24:51 EDT --- from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578039#c6 I t

[Bug 621445] New: .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non-latin TSCu_Paranar

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non-latin TSCu_Paranar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621445 Summary: .conf should use 65-0 to override 65-non

[Bug 578039] lang-specific overrides rule doesn't work as expected

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578039 K. Sethu changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 --- Additional comments from i...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 09:30:04 + 2010 --- But if fontconfig always uses the highest version of a font, we will have no pro

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 --- Additional comments from nmail...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 08:08:08 + 2010 --- @tl As I wrote before fontconfig will always serve apps the font files with

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 08:04:50 + 2010 --- Another noteworthy aspect of this question is whether and how the problem shows

[Bug 620606] Hinting on 'cent' glyph in italic fonts broken

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620606 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2010-08-04 04:16:53 EDT --- yes, hinting is really presently major thing for liberation ther

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 07:50:45 + 2010 --- @tl: Regarding *.tar.gz distributions of OOo the answer is simple: if you use t

[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntu-title-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 Paul Flo Williams changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 --- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 4 07:37:51 + 2010 --- tl->hdu: Are you sure abot that this is a task for the package specialist? I agr

[Issue 113586] Unable to get correct ver sion of OpenSymbol

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113586 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value