[Bug 864778] New: Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 Bug ID: 864778 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 18 Priority: unspecified CC: du...@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org,

[Bug 864781] New: nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 Bug ID: 864781 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: 18 Priority: unspecified CC: du...@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org,

[nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts] Update to 1.500-5.

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
commit 97f041921bfc6bd4a7ea39eb10d2a6eb7447553d Author: Daiki Ueno u...@unixuser.org Date: Wed Oct 10 15:12:31 2012 +0900 Update to 1.500-5. nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-fontconfig.conf |4 ++-- nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts.spec|5 - 2 files changed, 6

File NanumGothicCoding-2.0.zip uploaded to lookaside cache by ueno

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts: 6214a5844454c96faeac9a60539c7daf NanumGothicCoding-2.0.zip ___ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

[nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts] Update to 2.000-1.

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
commit 85b542571f157589abac786b48a6c528a05c9d4b Author: Daiki Ueno u...@unixuser.org Date: Wed Oct 10 15:54:21 2012 +0900 Update to 2.000-1. .gitignore |1 + nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts.spec | 21 +++-- sources|

[nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts/f18] (2 commits) ...Update to 2.000-1.

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
Summary of changes: 97f0419... Update to 1.500-5. (*) 85b5425... Update to 2.000-1. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent ___ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

[nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts/f17] (5 commits) ...Update to 2.000-1.

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
Summary of changes: a77796b... Update to 1.500-2. (*) 4a19a12... Merge branch 'master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/nhn-n (*) 92c303d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*) 97f0419... Update to 1.500-5. (*) 85b5425... Update to 2.000-1. (*) (*) This

[nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts/f16] (6 commits) ...Update to 2.000-1.

2012-10-10 Thread Daiki Ueno
Summary of changes: 6b7cbbf... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) a77796b... Update to 1.500-2. (*) 4a19a12... Merge branch 'master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/nhn-n (*) 92c303d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)

[Bug 864778] Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 864781] nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 864778] Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18

[Bug 864781] nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18

[Bug 864422] demo fonts are missing in font selection box

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864422 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #2) I suppose GtkFontChooser disables fallback font by default. so it's not that surprised even if Gurmukhi characters are displayed as the hex code on Liberation Mono. if

[Bug 428389] monospace font is strange on gnome-terminal.

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428389 sangu sangu.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 864778] Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 --- Comment #2 from sangu sangu.fed...@gmail.com --- Thanks! And after Updating to this package, bug 428389 was fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 864781] nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 --- Comment #2 from sangu sangu.fed...@gmail.com --- Thanks! this package works well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[Bug 864422] demo fonts are missing in font selection box

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864422 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psatp...@redhat.com

[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk

[Bug 864422] demo fonts are missing in font selection box

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864422 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) I suppose GtkFontChooser disables fallback font by default. so it's not that surprised even if Gurmukhi characters are displayed as the

[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Misformatted request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 --- Comment #6 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk --- (In reply to comment #5) Misformatted request. Could you please expand on that? I'm attempting to follow the template shown here:

[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 857487] Review Request: ht-alegreya-fonts - A Serif typeface originally intended for literature

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Complete, sorry for not reading the whole request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs

[Bug 852214] Review Request: overpass-fonts - Typeface based on the U.S. interstate highway road signage type system

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk

[Bug 852214] Review Request: overpass-fonts - Typeface based on the U.S. interstate highway road signage type system

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[Bug 864778] Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror

[Bug 864778] Wrong family in fontconfig config file

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864778 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 864781] nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 864781] nanum-gothic-coding fonts 2.0 released

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864781 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts-2.000-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror