[Bug 995788] smc-fonts are not appearing in fc-list

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995788 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com --- Hi Anivar, Unfortunately this got detected in very late stage of release cycle and release engineering included lohit-malayalam as a add on fonts due to lack of time.

[Bug 995788] smc-fonts are not appearing in fc-list

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995788 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 995788] smc-fonts are not appearing in fc-list

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995788 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pnem...@redhat.com

[Bug 995788] smc-fonts are not appearing in fc-list

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995788 --- Comment #3 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com --- We can't fix issues in Live GA images because there are no updates to Live images. If there is any issues in actual installation then we can look into that issue. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 995790] Wrong rendering for ്റ്റ in Lohit Malayalam

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995790 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You

[Bug 995943] New version?

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995943 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 995943] New version?

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995943 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Sorry, don't = font -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 995943] New version?

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995943 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- I don't know. I'm packaging a software which needs it. It has been packaged in Debian and this don't in Debian is 2.00. Then I found Fedora ships a 1.x version so I requested this.

[Bug 995943] New version?

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995943 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[pkgdb] drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ownership changed

2013-08-12 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts in Fedora 18 is now owned by frixxon To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[pkgdb] drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ownership changed

2013-08-12 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts in Fedora 19 is now owned by frixxon To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[pkgdb] drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ownership changed

2013-08-12 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by frixxon To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts ___ fonts-bugs mailing list

[Bug 984428] Serbian glyphs need improvement

2013-08-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984428 --- Comment #30 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #28) Yes, using Serbian locale, but locl+salt is too generic, it could involve other variants, maybe also in the Latin range, while