[google-noto-fonts] create the fonts subpackages with a macro

commit 0677610459cbdff8e4aadbc8b194ab16193d47dd Author: Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com Date: Tue Dec 2 19:13:44 2014 +1000 create the fonts subpackages with a macro %notopkg simplifies spec file a lot. Currently %_font_pkg is expanded by hand since it is causing a

[Bug 1160132] new release urw-fonts-1.10-1 made lilypond package failed to build

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160132 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- I agree, though lilypond's upstream has been less than receptive. It took me nearly a month to get to the right mailing list and get a response, and at this point the best idea they have

[Bug 1169979] New: Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 Bug ID: 1169979 Summary: Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: fontconfig Assignee: ta...@redhat.com

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 963917 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=963917action=edit F21 Workstation with the good font (DejaVu Sans Mono) -- You are receiving

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 --- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 963919 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=963919action=edit F21 Workstation with the bad font (Nimbus Mono L) To give an idea of the

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application blockerb...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com --- I was actually angling to just ninja this one in as all it requires is a spin-kickstarts change, but +1 FE. We do have the option of firing a complete RC3 for the

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Bug 1007493] shipped fonts.alias includes references to missing sazanami-times font

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007493 --- Comment #12 from N.Brack nicolas.br...@mail.be --- The problem still persists with me. First, there is no sazanami-fonts package whatsoever to be found in the repositories, only : sazanami-fonts-common.noarch

[Bug 1169979] Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |VERIFIED