[Bug 2185915] Failure to expand rpm macro

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185915 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue

[Bug 2185915] Failure to expand rpm macro

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185915 Panu Matilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2088665] Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 --- Comment #10 from t...@danielflaum.net --- I just checked, and the issue is still occurring for me on my main Fedora 37 install. I will try to reproduce in a clean VM later this week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 2088665] Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 Alejandro Ochoa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexvii...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0-2.f

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jerry

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue

[Bug 2185459] New: obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Bug ID: 2185459 Summary: obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #32 from

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 --- Comment #10 from marcd...@fedoraproject.org --- *** Bug 2129299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2184872] New: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts when substituting glyphs

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872 Bug ID: 2184872 Summary: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts when substituting glyphs Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2184790] adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184790 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',

[Bug 2184790] New: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184790 Bug ID: 2184790 Summary: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts Keywords:

[Bug 1076190] Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076190 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vishalvijayraghavan@gmail.c |peter

[Bug 1895482] Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs Incomplete

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895482 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vishalvijayraghavan@gmail.c |peter

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj

[Bug 2119608] Fonts SIG tracker bug

2023-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119608 Bug 2119608 depends on bug 2181956, which changed state. Bug 2181956 Summary: Review Request: python-fontrpmspec - Font Packaging tool for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181956 What|Removed

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||qt5-qtbase-5.15.8-10.fc38

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #39 from Than Ngo --- Brain, thanks for testing and feedbacks! Could you and other please grant the karma in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c7a23026f7 ? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #38 from

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #37 from Brian Morrison --- I have tried the qt5-qtbase*5.15.8-10 and qt5-qtwayland*5.15.8-6 packages from https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c7a23026f7 and they also work as expected. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #36 from

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #35 from Brian Morrison --- OK, I have tried this using the qt5-qtbase*5.15.8-10 packages and qt5-qtwayland*5.15.8-4.1 packages. Stopping and restarting a Qt application now seems to work OK, I have menus and the controls are the

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #34 from Brian Morrison --- OK, I will test it once the qt5-wayland packages are available too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #33 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #32) > So it is not going to work on GNOME Wayland? For GNOME Wayland we need to rebuild qt5-qtwayland against new qt5-qtbase. I will do this later. For quick test we

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #32 from Brian Morrison --- So it is not going to work on GNOME Wayland? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #31 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #29) > I can only see x86_64 rpms, my system has 2 .i686 rpms and I can't run the > upgrade without them. > > If someone can provide a scratch build with all arches

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen --- I tested https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/tagoh/qt5-qtbase/fedora-38-x86_64/05725782-qt5-qtbase/ too on X11 in Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-38-20230328.n.0.iso and now CJK output renders

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #29 from Brian Morrison --- I can only see x86_64 rpms, my system has 2 .i686 rpms and I can't run the upgrade without them. If someone can provide a scratch build with all arches present then I will try that. -- You are

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #28 from Than Ngo --- I downloaded and tested Akira's build, confirmed that it also works for me. Thanks Akira and Peng for the fix! @Brian and other, could you please test Akira's build and report the result before i do

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1953864 is|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #26 from Akira TAGOH --- Created attachment 1954381 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954381=edit v3 I'm almost consluding that we need to implement full-support of variable fonts if we want to fix this in a

[Bug 2051879] Review Request: fbf-ani-fonts - Script like Bengali Font

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051879 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Nemade --- Assigning via bugzilla command -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 ___ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of fonttools-4.39.3-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99251116 -- You are

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1954246 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954246=edit Update to 4.39.3 (#2182480) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2182480] New: fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 Bug ID: 2182480 Summary: fonttools-4.39.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fontawesome-fonts-6.3.0 is |fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 --- Comment #31 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-0uhw4olj/fontawesome-fonts.spec']'

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #25 from Akira TAGOH --- You can't replace FcFontMatch with FcFontSort. I'm not sure if there are really any such code paths though, they set FC_FILE and FC_INDEX only when QFontEngine::FaceId has a filename. This implies that

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #24 from Peng Wu --- BTW, the patch disables the freetype code about embolden value in Qt with Linux only. And in fontconfig, the similar logic of the freetype code is implemented in the /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf file.

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #23 from Peng Wu --- As Akira Tagoh said, there are two issues in the code, so I just updated my patch. 1. The usage of FcFontMatch may be not correct, as it doesn't compare the FC_INDEX when matching. In the patch, I switch to

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1952248 is|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(p...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #21 from Peng Wu --- I can

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #20 from Akira TAGOH ---

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #18 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) -- You are

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(p...@redhat.com) -- You are

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #19 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #17) > I unpushed the update sin(In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #14) > > I tried the qt5-qtbase and qt5-qtwayland updates in the update from comment > > 13. > >

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #17 from Jan

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Geoffrey Marr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gm...@redhat.com Whiteboard|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Brian Morrison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@fenrir.org.uk --- Comment #14

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #12 from Than Ngo --- i built qt5-qtbase/qt5-qtwayland including your patch for rawhide and f38. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2176339 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2176011

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #11 from Than Ngo --- Akira, could you please forward your patch to upstream for review? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854

[Bug 2119608] Fonts SIG tracker bug

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119608 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2181956 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH --- Created attachment 1953864 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953864=edit v2 I should do the null-check for FT_MM_Var. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2083913 |

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj

[Bug 706559] Font variants not used correctly

2023-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559 modrk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||modrk@gmail.com --- Comment #35 from

[Bug 2056256] Review Request: fbf-jamrul-fonts - Sans-Serif styled OpenType Bengali Font

2023-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056256 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mitra_anirban@yah | |oo.co.in)

[Bug 2056257] Review Request: fbf-likhan-fonts -Serif styled OpenType Bengali Font

2023-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056257 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mitra_anirban@yah | |oo.co.in)

[Bug 2176049] F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode

2023-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176049 Fedora Fails To Install changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 2176049] F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode

2023-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176049 Fedora Fails To Install changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pnem...@redhat.co | |m)

[Bug 2152347] Review Request: makemusic-finale-fonts - MakeMusic Finale fonts

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2180243 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2176049] F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176049 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2152347] Review Request: makemusic-finale-fonts - MakeMusic Finale fonts

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 Jakub Kadlčík changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://makemusic.zendesk.c

[Bug 2152347] Review Request: makemusic-finale-fonts - MakeMusic Finale fonts

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James --- Sorry to go silent on this for so long. I've had to work through a number of issues with MuseScore itself. I think I finally have them all worked out, so I'm going to try to proceed with the various font

[Bug 2179416] fonttools-4.39.2 is available

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179416 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2179416] fonttools-4.39.2 is available

2023-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Nemade --- Assigning via bugzilla command -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179416 ___ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[Bug 2179416] fonttools-4.39.2 is available

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179416 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of fonttools-4.39.2-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98816853 -- You are

[Bug 2179416] fonttools-4.39.2 is available

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179416 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1951520 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1951520=edit Update to 4.39.2 (#2179416) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2179416] New: fonttools-4.39.2 is available

2023-03-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179416 Bug ID: 2179416 Summary: fonttools-4.39.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2176049] F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode

2023-03-14 Thread bugzilla
an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions: - Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository. (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla

[Bug 2168496] freetype-2.13.0 is available

2023-03-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168496 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fonttools-4.19.1-1.el9 |fonttools-4.19.1-1.el9

[Bug 2176049] New: F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode

2023-03-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176049 Bug ID: 2176049 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: python3-fonttools+unicode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Assignee: pnem...@redhat.com

[Bug 2176001] fonttools-4.39.0 is available

2023-03-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176001 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 2176001] fonttools-4.39.0 is available

2023-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Nemade --- Assigning via bugzilla command -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176001 ___ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[Bug 2176001] fonttools-4.39.0 is available

2023-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176001 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of fonttools-4.39.0-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98387476 -- You are

[Bug 2176001] fonttools-4.39.0 is available

2023-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176001 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1948619 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1948619=edit Update to 4.39.0 (#2176001) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2176001] New: fonttools-4.39.0 is available

2023-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176001 Bug ID: 2176001 Summary: fonttools-4.39.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6a2ccf5912 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6a2ccf5912 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6a2ccf5912 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 Bug 2158537 depends on bug 2158540, which changed state. Bug 2158540 Summary: Please branch and build python-ufoLib2 in epel9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158540 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2123720] Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai

2023-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2123722] Noto Khmer to default for Khmer

2023-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-03-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 Bug 2158537 depends on bug 2158539, which changed state. Bug 2158539 Summary: Please branch and build python-munkres in epel9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158539 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2168496] freetype-2.13.0 is available

2023-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168496 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2168496] freetype-2.13.0 is available

2023-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168496 --- Comment #5 from Marek Kašík --- Hi, I've pushed the 2.13.0 to Fedora 38. It will get to stable after Beta freeze. The changes involved just a limited set of packages which I've rebuilt and they stabilized a previously experimental API.

[Bug 2051859] Review Request: fbf-mitra-font : Experimental Monospace Bengali Font

2023-02-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |

[Bug 2168496] freetype-2.13.0 is available

2023-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168496 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 --- Comment #9 from Parag Nemade --- 1) I like to keep same version that exists in rhel9 in epel9 2) if someone requests updated version then I have no issues to update it 3) Because of circular deps, I preferred to build fonttools version

[Bug 2158537] Please branch and build fonttools in epel9

2023-02-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158537 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@nwra.com --- Comment #8 from

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >