[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Dave Crossland changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #2 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-28 10:32:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > The ChromeOS fonts may have the

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #3 from Dave Crossland 2010-11-28 11:05:22 EST --- http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/tinos/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #4 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-28 14:52:45 EST --- OK, Dave, you're right, Tinos does support Cyrillic as per

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Ben Laenen changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Alessandro Ceschini changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #8 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 08:47:57 EST --- OK, first things first. Dear Pravin Sapute, I'm sure you'll

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #9 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 08:52:06 EST --- Now straight to second issue. Dear Ben Laenen, the connexio

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #10 from Ben Laenen 2010-11-29 10:45:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Now straight to second issue. Dear Ben La

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #11 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 16:43:55 EST --- For Ben Laenen: I posted the relevant bug report here: htt

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #12 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 16:50:58 EST --- For Pravin Satpute: please at section 2 (Italic), line 4 r

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Alessandro Ceschini changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Alessandro Ceschini changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #14 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 17:14:00 EST --- In order to avoid annoying misunderstandings, the correcte

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #13 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-29 17:12:12 EST --- Created attachment 463595 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #16 from Alessandro Ceschini 2010-11-30 02:23:10 EST --- Dear Pravin Satpute, I appreciate your effort but I've to

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2010-11-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute 2010-11-30 04:18:40 EST --- yeah, recently we did this for Lohit see https://www.redhat.c

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-09-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #18 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-09-29 18:50:58 EDT --- Bump! Any news down here? It's almost a year since I opene

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #19 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-10 02:02:17 EDT --- Hi Alessandro, I am looking into it, will try to update by n

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #20 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-11 06:52:06 EDT --- Hello Mr. Sapute, I can't wait for you to post some betas

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Alessandro Ceschini changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #23 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-12 06:30:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created attachment 463595 [details]

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #24 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-12 06:41:28 EDT --- Oh, really? I just checked it and U+0442, that's the value

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #25 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-12 06:47:06 EDT --- I meant the shape you see in pdf that's the small ITALIC,

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-12 06:54:52 EDT --- Created attachment 527671 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/att

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #27 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-12 07:50:20 EDT --- Created attachment 527681 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/att

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #28 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-12 12:05:21 EDT --- Ok, first things first this link shows you the difference

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #30 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-12 12:21:53 EDT --- Identical, except for U+0431, I think the pdf is quite cle

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #29 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-12 12:19:52 EDT --- As far as the font is concerned, I opened it in FontForge.

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #31 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-13 03:58:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Ok, first things first this link sh

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #33 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-13 04:32:04 EDT --- Created attachment 527886 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #32 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-13 04:30:13 EDT --- Sorry, I used upright instead of regular. That's my fault.

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2011-10-14 05:52:09 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.07.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an u

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #36 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-15 11:25:56 EDT --- How can I download it in Ubuntu? I'm using Ubuntu 11.04, n

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #37 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-19 07:53:43 EDT --- Created attachment 528987 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Зоран В. Петровић changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #40 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 02:16:43 EDT --- Hello again. When I put "IN Sans Serif italic fonts You can

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #41 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-20 03:27:48 EDT --- Hi Зоран, Thanks for checking changes. Sorry still not under

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #43 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 03:46:27 EDT --- Created attachment 529208 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #42 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 03:45:04 EDT --- Created attachment 529207 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #44 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 04:16:36 EDT --- Hello. 1. Liberation Sans Narrow Italic font is without Ser

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #45 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-20 04:32:13 EDT --- Thanks for detailed information. Yeah, I have only added suppor

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #46 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-20 06:48:59 EDT --- Sorry guys if I keep asking the same question, but where c

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #47 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 07:07:02 EDT --- Created attachment 529238 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #48 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-20 07:15:56 EDT --- yeah, yet no commit to upstream once it will be tested thorough

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #49 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-20 07:55:07 EDT --- Thanks Zoran, going to test and then report. Anyhow, only

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #50 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-20 08:02:44 EDT --- Ahem, before releasing my humble suggestion is that you fi

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #51 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 08:29:35 EDT --- Created attachment 529258 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #52 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-20 08:35:05 EDT --- Created attachment 529259 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #53 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-20 08:49:54 EDT --- Ubuntu is a font that NATIVELY, that is as per its design,

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #55 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-20 09:12:13 EDT --- I've seen some crappy positioning in a sample text, but it

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #56 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-23 06:45:48 EDT --- Hello folks, I'm sorry but I won't be of any help for this

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #57 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-23 23:11:29 EDT --- gedit works fine with it LANG=sr_RS.UTF-8 gedit -- Configure

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #58 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 06:25:16 EDT --- All right, nice to see gedit too supports OpenType (I didn

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #59 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 08:53:54 EDT --- Created attachment 529862 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #60 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 09:10:52 EDT --- Created attachment 529868 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #62 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 14:09:28 EDT --- Created attachment 529939 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #61 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 14:05:57 EDT --- Created attachment 529937 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #63 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 14:12:03 EDT --- Created attachment 529940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #64 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 14:27:54 EDT --- I understand now, you mean the underline above TE should b

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #66 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 15:12:01 EDT --- Created attachment 529947 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #67 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 15:12:43 EDT --- Created attachment 529948 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #65 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 15:11:22 EDT --- Created attachment 529946 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #68 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 15:19:03 EDT --- Created attachment 529950 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #69 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-24 15:42:49 EDT --- Created attachment 529956 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #70 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 16:12:35 EDT --- Thanks for you help, Зоране. This problems almost certainl

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #71 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-24 16:26:30 EDT --- As I can see from your pictures, this flaw affects FontFor

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #72 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-24 23:44:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > Created attachment 529956 [details]

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #73 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-25 02:19:34 EDT --- Created attachment 530006 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Зоран В. Петровић changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #76 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-25 02:36:47 EDT --- Created attachment 530014 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #77 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-25 02:40:01 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for identifying difference, If Dejavu works in XeTe

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #78 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-25 02:58:30 EDT --- Hello. Mister Alessandro Ceschini is XeLaTeX man. I used Te

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #79 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-25 05:00:36 EDT --- To Pravin: Adobe Minion, Garamond Pro, Myriad, DejaVu, Ubu

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #81 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-10-25 06:17:45 EDT --- Created attachment 530045 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #83 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-25 06:37:14 EDT --- Created attachment 530053 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #82 from Зоран В. Петровић 2011-10-25 06:36:32 EDT --- Created attachment 530052 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-10-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #84 from Pravin Satpute 2011-10-31 00:11:37 EDT --- Thanks Alessandro for confirmation, yes i would like to go with

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Yuri Khan changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #86 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-12-23 05:47:16 EST --- Hi Yuri OK, so please add Serbian localized glyphs for Li

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #88 from Yuri Khan 2011-12-23 06:13:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #86) > OK, so please add Serbian localized glyp

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #87 from Pravin Satpute 2011-12-23 06:10:42 EST --- Remaining task is - Add support for serbian characters in Mon

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #89 from Alessandro Ceschini 2011-12-23 06:41:51 EST --- Hi Pravin As for kerning, tell me if I can help you by do

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2011-12-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #90 from Pravin Satpute 2011-12-25 23:24:54 EST --- Hi Alessandro, Few test combinations will work. We have a

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #91 from Pravin Satpute 2012-01-31 06:55:39 EST --- 1) Added Serbian localized shapes in Sans, Serif and Sans Narro

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #92 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-09 03:44:54 EST --- liberation-fonts-1.07.2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an u

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #94 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-13 11:03:50 EST --- liberation-fonts-1.07.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an u

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 657849] Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

2012-03-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 --- Comment #96 from Alessandro Ceschini 2012-03-07 11:35:47 EST --- Hi Pravin, sorry I've been too busy of late, but now I'm b

  1   2   >